• femboy_link.mp4@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As someone with a soft spot for the series, I personally enjoyed it well enough. It’s another Indiana Jones movie, it’s quite formulaic, but its fun and it works for its intended purpose. It was never going to be incredible, high-brow cinema and I do wonder why anyone who has seen any of the others expected it to be anything other than what it was.

    • fades@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These days people will shit on anything and everything

      Good movies can be objectively fun or objectively good or both, but these days it’s all shit unless it’s both

  • Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t say I agree with that take, I thought it was one of the better Indiana Jones movies, maybe even better than Temple Of Doom. It ticked all the boxes for me.

    • skribe@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe even better than Temple of Doom

      They should put that on the posters.

      Damned with faint praise, indeed.

      • orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I enjoyed Temple of Doom, more as a kid but for a general adventure story it work for me. I’ve also been watching Red Letter Media’s review of it recently so that may have skewed it higher. I always liked the idea of the old stories where someone could have an out of order adventure. For those that may not know we’d call it a prequel these days but it was modeled off of old stories that were just told for the same characters. Oddly whenever I try and create a cultist type story (Lovecraft and pulp) in my head it turns out very similar to Temple of Doom, so that probably impacts my opinion of it.

    • DocWurzel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here, I enjoyed the film. It portrayed Jones well as an aging person who is past their prime giving it one last shot. The action was good, the plot was enjoyable, the Nazis got a kicking. What’s not to like?

      • Rimorso@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically all the chase scenes were camera glued 10 cm from the protagonists and shaky cam for 15 minutes at a time.

        • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh noooooo! I was just rewatching Raiders the other day and thinking about how good the camera work was, and how if they shot it today half of those fight scenes would be incomprehensible shaky cam. Sad to hear that Dial has fallen to the shaky side.

    • Poteau_Poutre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same, I don’t understant all the hate. It had all the ingredients to make a good Indiana Jones movie

  • Garzak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I first heard about that movie, my reaction was “I hope the actors got the fattest check they could from the morons who had this idea”. I’m happy the movie is failing. I don’t plan on watching it.

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      MacGyver already discovered it. (We literally had a TV ad for that movie with the a sentence that roughly translates as “MacGyver, the adventurer who shows Indiana Jones who’s boss”)