• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Probably, but that kind of depends on level of detail and how the raster data was encoded. I’m guessing initial download may actually be comparable or a bit slower since they’d probably send most of the data for your requested area, but interactivity will be a lot better (no need to download higher res chunks as you zoom).

  • cosmic_slate@dmv.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    The significance of this is that it should make seeing updates to OSM data a lot quicker, and I’d assume making the “look” a better too.

  • mikesailin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m very happy to see OSM moving in the vector tiles direction. I was glad to contribute.

  • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am so giddy for when OpenStreetMaps becomes a viable GPS use case. Right now I’m using Waze, making it my last Google product on my phone.

    • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      In which way is it not viable yet? I guess it depends a lot on what app you use but I’ve been happy with OsmAnd and Organic Maps.

      • cosmic_slate@dmv.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I think the issue with Organic Maps is the lack of real-time traffic data (unless that’s changed).

        That said, Organic Maps routing seems good enough without it. I occasionally compare routes from Apple Maps, Google Maps, my car’s nav, and Organic Maps. Organic Maps hasn’t given a route that I’d say is unreasonable.

          • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Something about Magic Earth unsettles me. It appears highly polished, but free. It’s not clear how they’re making enough money to stay afloat.

            Also, crowd-sourced realtime traffic is only as good as the crowd it’s sourcing from. I’m speculating, but I somehow doubt there’s a big enough crowd using Magic Earth where I am.

            • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think I once read they sell it (including the real time traffic data) for use in car infotainment systems and other specialized hardware that needs GPS navigation.

              • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Looking through the list of data collected, most of it is anonymized. For now.

                What concerns me is that their privacy policy only says they’ll publish variations to it on their website - no mention of proactive notification to users.

                For me, that’d be a hard pass, but others might not share my concerns. It definitely looks like a nice, polished alternative to the big G.

            • Helix 🧬@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s not clear how they’re making enough money to stay afloat.

              Yes it is. It is basically marketing for their embedded products which they sell as whitelabel apps for makers of cars, satnavs and other GIS applications.

  • Fisch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is great! I was actually wondering why they weren’t doing this already.