• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    3 months ago

    Definitely do this. It puts broadcasters in control of their data and their brand and not the arbitrary whims of some third party.

    • Wodge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      3 months ago

      Every company should do it. Have their own instance, have a main corporate account, one for each of their brands, and availability of for staff to have accounts there.

      Companies complain about the lack of moderation on twitter under Musk, so do something about it.

  • thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    3 months ago

    In the UK the BBC are running their own instance social.bbc on trial basis, and I think the trial was recently extended.

    Hopefully other public bodies will follow suit.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wish, and that would also give another push to RSS feeds which are builtin, to follow people without having an account.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can’t believe all public entities didn’t jump on ASAP. It just makes so much sense.

  • nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    What is the Mastodon Lemmy.world equivalent? Like a big, neutral server with minimal censorship and bullshit, and access to most other servers?

      • Soullioness@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If I’m not mistaken they also run other software too? I just can’t think of what else. Definitely both Lemmy and Mastodon. Pretty cool really.

        • Star@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          They also run bookwyrm.world! A fediverse alternative of Goodreads.

          • isles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh thank you so much for sharing! I abandoned Goodreads because it lacked trustworthiness (why does an unreleased novel have 10,000 5 star reviews?)

              • isles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Well, at least there’s the veneer of authenticity, ha. Thanks for the extra context.

            • revisable677@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Not federated but I can really recommend trying out hardcover.app/

              They’re not federated but have very good import/export tools if you want to take your data somewhere else.

              • isles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Thank you! I’ll check that out as well, though I value highly federation.

                • revisable677@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Me too, hopefully they federate at some point. The team behind Hardcover seem to support the ideas of the open web… at least data portability and so on. Let’s see if a meaningful connection with Bookwyrm is possible in the future.