The Defense of Logistics Agency (DLA), acting on behalf of the Department of Air Force (DAF), on Aug. 31 issued a Notice of Intent to Award (NOITA) that selects the Santa Clara, California–based nuclear technology firm’s Aurora Powerhouse for its Eielson Air Force Base pilot and initiates an acquisition process to potentially award Oklo a 30-year, firm-fixed-price contract to pilot the advanced nuclear energy technology.

I feel like this should have been an easy contract for renewables to win. Of course, the government is going to waste money on nuclear when they could have went with wind and solar.

  • virr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is very good. Oklo is specifically aiming to provide power with minimal maintenance to remote areas that otherwise wouldn’t have power. This contract is a very good testbed for the technology before being deployed to remote areas.

    There have been research reactor that have been run successfully that cannot meltdown like Fukushima, Chernobyl, or Three Mile Island. Oklo is a fast reactor of similar design. Such reactor designs often will cool down and the nuclear reaction stop even when completely losing all coolant and power. They fundamentally cannot get into a positive feedback loop like an reactors that are have been run commercially. I’m unsure how long Oklo’s nuclear waste is dangerous, but some fast reactors can actually be used to burn up waste from other reactors making. Their waste is dangerous for a few hundred years, instead of the tens of thousands of years of other reactors.

  • p1mrx@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    when they could have went with wind and solar.

    Eielson air force base is in the middle of Alaska. They get 4 hours of daylight in the winter, and minimal wind.

    • ZMonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I used to do wind studies in remote regions in Alaska. We have very reliable albeit low velocity winds during the winter months. Just FYI.

        • ZMonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, it’s what we call low velocity wind. It tends to be very laminar even at low altitudes due to the lower brush and tundra. There were some low velocity turbine concepts at the time but there was just no interest for it. But there is a massive energy resource available at a time when you need it here most. Hopefully things change. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      That was my thought as well. I think the picture didn’t help.

      With how many b-52s that crashed, I’m glad they didn’t all have a nuclear reactor on board.

      • avapa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        With how many B-52s that carried thermonuclear bombs and crashed, I’m glad the US didn’t accidentally nuke itself and other countries.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Had to read this twice to understand it’s not about nuclear powered planes. But yeah, more money down the drain.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah that’s obvious from the title.

      They’ve got a nuclear powered pilot. I assume to save on catering.