So in this latest tit-for-tat, the “terrorist organization” precisely targeted a military vehicle.
Then, “the most moral army in the world” responded by dropping internationally banned chemical agent on a few towns.
WP isn’t banned outright, using it on people is a war crime though.
what’s the difference? other than being pedantic?
It has legitimate uses for illumination and smokescreen cover. Saying it’s “banned” is objectively incorrect.
Unmanned objectives exist in war
not the first time they’ve used phosphorus shells on Lebanon, did the same thing last year: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/lebanon-evidence-of-israels-unlawful-use-of-white-phosphorus-in-southern-lebanon-as-cross-border-hostilities-escalate/
So are they at war now?
If they were at war this would be a war crime as I understand it. For now it’s just a sparkling atrocity.