• notthebees@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    9 months ago

    This article is missing Jamboard, mainly bc no one knew it existed.

    This is an actual email I got today.

    • debounced@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      it’s also a big FU to everyone accessing Gmail’s web interface over geostationary satellite internet connections. i had to deal with that shit for a few months and HTML mode was the only way to ease the pain from how bad the latency can get. the “normal” view would hang like a mofo all the time.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, it would and I will never understand why someone would use the web interface.

          • Ansis@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Because Gmail filters emails by type. Receiving emails on a client throws all the garbage in one inbox.

            • Clegko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Not quite, though. Gmail uses labels, but translates that to folders on IMAP. You can set your client to download the folders automatically, and if an email goes into a specific folder don’t put it in the app’s Inbox. Then you just check your inbox and folders just like you would on Gmail’s webclient.

            • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Honestly, I don’t use gmail much, but I really just want a normal inbox, folders, and rules I can define to filter stuff. Netscape E-Mail circa 1998 was all I ever wanted, and I still miss the PITA trying to get even close to that interface today.

          • Nahvi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I can’t speak for others, but I typically don’t use email on the PC. When it is more convenient to use the PC, usually because of an attachment, I will log into the browser version.

      • Nahvi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Agreed. I’ve reverted to HTML mode recently when tethering from my phone. The signal is bad enough sometimes that it makes a world of difference. Gmail was virtually unusable until I realized HTML mode was still an option.

        Really just time to bite the bullet and acknowledge that it is worth the hassle to switch away from a company that I don’t like or trust.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      The big tragedy there is the loss for the visually impaired. They can switch to a new email provider, but they will have to switch over any necessary emails such as subscription reminders and they will have to be able to download or transfer what might be a decade’s worth of archived emails. That will likely be beyond some of them in terms of technical capability and possibly accessibility.

      But then Google couldn’t give two shits about the disabled.

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’d be better off using a client like tetramail that is designed for the visually impaired. Afaik Gmail still supports imap

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ll pour one out for Google Podcasts. I eventually settled on it because it was free, cross-platform, and also kept my podcast life separate from my music library or YouTube views. If you’re a multi-ecosystem home and don’t want your podcast stuff with your music, it really was the best option.

    And I definitely won’t be going to YouTube Music with them. I don’t even want my music habits commingling with my YouTube habit and getting recommendations that are just music videos for months.

  • Nusm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    I will never - NEVER - forgive them for shutting down Google Reader. That’s the closest I’ve come to cutting everything Google out of my life, and I’m still salty about it today.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Google is killing off so many products lately we need to do a roundup or we won’t get anything else done today.

    YouTube has been slowly consuming all of Google’s media properties, and podcasts completes the trinity along with videos (both amateur and scripted Hollywood content) and music.

    This was announced on the official YouTube blog, if there was any question about the responsible party.

    In 2024, Google Podcasts will die at 8 years old, if you want to count from the weird Google Search beginnings, but only has had the bare minimum feature set of a podcast service for four years.

    If you’ve never heard of this, that’s because it got a very small rollout to only Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden.

    You can throw this shutdown into the pile of “Google price increases” this year.


    The original article contains 493 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!