Look, Up in the Sky! It’s a Can of Soup!
news.yahoo.com
COLLEGE STATION, Texas — Exactly a decade ago, Amazon revealed a program that aimed to revolutionize shopping and shipping. Drones launched from a central hub would waft through the skies delivering just about everything anyone could need. They would be fast, innovative, ubiquitous — all the Amazon hallmarks. The buzzy announcement, made by Jeff Bezos on “60 Minutes” as part of a Cyber Monday promotional package, drew global attention. “I know this looks like science fiction. It’s not,” said Bez

Only one item can be delivered at a time. It can’t weigh more than 5 pounds. It can’t be too big. It can’t be something breakable, since the drone drops it from 12 feet. The drones can’t fly when it is too hot or too windy or too rainy.

You need to be home to put out the landing target and to make sure that a porch pirate doesn’t make off with your item or that it doesn’t roll into the street (which happened once to Lord and Silverman). But your car can’t be in the driveway. Letting the drone land in the backyard would avoid some of these problems, but not if there are trees.

Amazon has also warned customers that drone delivery is unavailable during periods of high demand for drone delivery.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nlEnglish
    3·
    8 months ago

    Define “just fine”? Needless deaths and property damage are caused by human drivers all the time. I mean we could deliver things “just fine” on foot but everyone would be waiting a lot longer…

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      13·
      8 months ago

      All the time? I’d like to see the statistics on deaths caused by delivery drivers.

      And I’m not sure why you think similar things wouldn’t happen with drones.

      • hamms@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        8 months ago

        According to The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:

        A total of 4,714 people died in large truck crashes in 2021, a 17 percent increase compared with 2020. Sixteen percent of these deaths were truck occupants, 68 percent were occupants of cars and other passenger vehicles, and 15 percent were pedestrians, bicyclists or motorcyclists.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nlEnglish
        2·
        8 months ago

        …why would they? Even in the rare occurrence that it were to fall out of the sky there’s very little chance it would hit anyone. And even in the exceptionally rare occurrence that it were to hit someone, they’re incredibly light and unlikely to cause serious damage, much less kill anyone.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          12·
          8 months ago

          Even in the rare occurrence that it were to fall out of the sky there’s very little chance it would hit anyone.

          …unless it’s in a city.

          And even in the exceptionally rare occurrence that it were to hit someone, they’re incredibly light and unlikely to cause serious damage, much less kill anyone.

          …unless it’s a large drone carrying a heavy package.

          If we’re going to replace delivery drivers with drones, they have to be able to carry more than a single five-pound item.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nlEnglish
            2·
            8 months ago

            …unless it’s in a city.

            Even harder in a city since it would have to nosedive between buildings.

            …unless it’s a large drone carrying a heavy package.

            One of many reasons they have weight limits.

            If we’re going to replace delivery drivers with drones, they have to be able to carry more than a single five-pound item.

            They’ll likely never replace them entirely.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
              12·
              8 months ago

              You know there are places in cities with tons of pedestrians, right? And sometimes things from high up fall on them and kill them, right?

              Also, if they have weight limits, we won’t be replacing drivers with them. There will still be drivers. So I’m not sure how this saves lives.