Quexotic@infosec.pub to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-28 months agoI think it could just be that simple rule...infosec.pubimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down10
arrow-up1518arrow-down1imageI think it could just be that simple rule...infosec.pubQuexotic@infosec.pub to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-28 months agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoWell no, there are objective harms and subjective harms. If I slap you that’s an objective harm. If I’m gay and that’s objectional to you, that’s a subjective harm to some people. Essentially physical acts v emotional harms.
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoSome people may see all morales as God given and therefore absolute
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoPerhaps absolute but still not objective. I can prove things that are objective with repetition, subjective things not so much.
Well no, there are objective harms and subjective harms.
If I slap you that’s an objective harm.
If I’m gay and that’s objectional to you, that’s a subjective harm to some people.
Essentially physical acts v emotional harms.
Some people may see all morales as God given and therefore absolute
Perhaps absolute but still not objective. I can prove things that are objective with repetition, subjective things not so much.