Column: California strikes another blow against rooftop solar
www.latimes.com
We need to stop arguing and start working together on a crucial climate solution.

But critics insist the costs of those solar panels are beginning to outweigh the benefits.

Incentive payments to homes with solar, they say, have led to higher electricity rates for everyone else — including families that can’t afford rooftop panels. If so, that’s not only unfair, it’s damaging to the state’s climate progress. Higher electricity rates make it less likely that people will drive electric cars and install electric heat pumps in their homes — crucial climate solutions.

The solar industry disputes the argument that solar incentive payments are driving up rates, as do many environmental activists. But Newsom’s appointees to the Public Utilities Commission are convinced, as they made clear Thursday.

“We need to reach our [climate] goals as fast as we can,” said Alice Reynolds, the commission’s president. “But we also need to be extremely thoughtful about how we reach our climate change goals in the most cost-effective manner.”

When I am having a stroke, I don’t stop and calculate of the most cost effective treatment options. I go to the emergency room. We could have done this calculation in 1970 and acted, but that ship has sailed.

  • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    25·
    8 months ago

    That infrastructure would already have to be there without the solar panels on the roof

    Exactly, that’s the whole problem. Maintenance of that connection costs money, and unless you have large amounts of battery storage, you are still using power generated by the electric company.

    The electric company also gets excess power generated by the home sold to it at a discount.

    Often, this is not the case at all. If 50% of electricity costs are generation, but someone’s solar panels run the meter backward, the electric company is basically paying that homeowner double the going rate.