• bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      War resulted in famine my ass.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1930%E2%80%931933

      And famine is just the start. If you think any government is competent enough to handle the orchestration of a system is large and complicated as a modern economy you are hilariously mistaken.

      I wouldn’t even know where to start. Basically every single item in your house runs through some sort of supply chain that would get fucked up if we tried to manage them all through some central planned economy.

      • Raphael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Same page:

        Slaughter of livestock

        During collectivization, the peasantry was required to relinquish their farm animals to government authorities. Many chose to slaughter their livestock rather than give them up to collective farms. In the first two months of 1930, kulaks killed millions of cattle, horses, pigs, sheep, and goats, with the meat and hides being consumed and bartered. In 1934, the 17th Congress of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) reported that 26.6 million head of cattle and 63.4 million sheep had been lost.[68] In response to the widespread slaughter, the Sovnarkom issued decrees to prosecute “the malicious slaughtering of livestock” (Russian: хищнический убой скота).[69]

        Resistance

        Thousands of Kazakhs violently resisted the collectivization campaign with weapons left over by the white army with 8 rebellions occurring in 1930 alone. [97] In the Mangyshlak Peninsula 15,000 rebels resisted between 1929 and 1931.

        Also

        Some kulaks responded by carrying out acts of sabotage such as killing livestock and destroying crops intended for consumption by factory workers

        They fought against collectivization thinking something would happen. They unleashed a famine upon themselves.

        EDIT: This part is so ridiculous I need to repeat it:

        reported that 26.6 million head of cattle and 63.4 million sheep had been lost.

        So much milk lost, could have fed so many people, you can bet there were millions of chickens too, millions of eggs that were never laid, kill the cattle, kill the natural cycle of reproduction, tonnes and tonnes of meat that were never born.

        Some reactionaries BURNED FARMS to oppose communism, no wonder they starved.

        • bioemerl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You do a very good job cherry picking, but all of these things together couldn’t starve a nation.

          At the end of the day what killed the Soviet Union was the fact that they.

          1. Created a system or the people producing the food weren’t making shit and had no incentive to actually work.

          2. Opted to try to blame rich people instead of their own shitty system for causing the famine.

          • Raphael@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Killing millions of cattle and burning crops couldn’t starve a nation, hmm. OK, supremacist.

            • bioemerl@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The cattle part could could cause shortages, but at the end of the day when you don’t have cattle you can still feed people perfectly fine.

              You won’t get to eat nearly as much meat, but you can still eat.

              I’m mainly referring to the fact that you’re trying to blame the rebellion from the evil rich people for the cause of the famine instead of the very real economic misincentices created by the Soviet Union