• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    supreme court decided that its ok to remove the only black district from an obviously, legally ruled gerrymandered maps.

    once again, racists proving who they are all the way to the top.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t forget that two of the sitting Supreme Court Justices committed perjury during their testimony before Congress while interviewing for the job. Another has admitted to accepting bribes valued in the millions from parties with matters before the court. None of them have faced any repercussions.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There won’t be history when were all dead from climate change and the planet is a ball of lifeless rock.

    • Telorand@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 months ago

      Technically, SCOTUS didn’t do anything. They refused to take up the case, which means the 5th Circuit’s ruling, that superseded both lower courts that affirmed it was illegal by saying “we’ll address it next year after the primaries,” was the final say.

      The thing that needs to be made sense of is why the 5th Circuit is allowed to operate in bad-faith as a rubber stamp for everything Conservative.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In October, a District Court ruled the redrawn map was unlawful, violated the Voting Rights Act and ordered a new one should be created.

    Later, the Fifth Circuit put its ruling on hold and is due to review it next year, two months after Texas’ primary contest in March 2024.

    Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law, told the news network that the case has “broader implications.”

    “The [Fifth Circuit] court of appeals justified letting the unlawful map stay in place in a way that will make it much harder, going forward, for plaintiffs in Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas to persuade any federal judge to block an unlawful map except in very short windows after elections take place,” he said.

    Leon County Circuit Judge J. Lee Marsh said in September that a suit against the map, approved by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, was correct.

    The map “results in the diminishment of Black voters’ ability to elect their candidate of choice in violation of the Florida constitution,” Judge Marsh wrote in a ruling.


    The original article contains 402 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!