I want to build a void linux based system with awesomeWM window manager

But immediately there was a question about the choice of DE

After googling I realized that xfce and lxqt are suitable for me.

Which one should I use?

  • mekkagodzilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you need a DE? I use sway and a few kde apps (konsole, okular, gwenview, dolphin) + firefox and thunderbird, I wouldn’t call that a DE…

    • loss_and_quick@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t want to autostart all programs by myself, most of DE control autostart and dbus session by it self… Furthermore,DEs are contain settings manager etc

  • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The idea of those window managers is to ‘skip’ having to use desktop environment.

    On WM you do stuff differently. Mostly configured on your WM config. You don’t really need to use DE.

  • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lxqt is lighter weight and more future proof. Xfce is more mature, full featured, and easier to find gtk apps to use

  • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both have good file managers. XFCE has more options for visual customisation in my opinion. Memory usage is similar. I think XFCE works better with multiple monitors. I use LXQt and it is a little quirky—but that may be related to Openbox.

  • surfrock66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For a long time my setup was mate with Compton and awesome but I had to switch to just mate as my family and kids started using the computer more. Mate’s gtk suite is lightweight and complements awesome well as it gets out of the way, and caja/pluma/etc worked well with very few rough edges.