The administration of US President Joe Biden refuses to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, despite requests from Kyiv and pressure from US lawmakers.

  • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a complicated one. Military tech tends to all be 10+ years old at time of deployment and the ones stockpiled are probably late 90s designs that went into production in the early 2000s. Most of the parts for the control and guidance systems are likely no longer produced at all and haven’t been for a decade+ (think the kinds of computer chips you’d find in a SNES, maaaaybe an N64) so it’s not that they don’t have the blueprint somewhere, they would have to re design large parts of it to work in a modern supply chain. Yes, they could do emulation/simulation shenanigans to get some stuff to be compatible on modem COTS hardware but they’d still need to re qualify everything because nobody wants a 500lb ballistic warhead going stupid and killing someone in the wrong country.

    • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds like it might be true, but is it? I’ve heard many things in relation to this weapon, but not anything about the inability to produce them.

      • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shrug? This is what the budgets have indicated. The military isn’t interested in pursuing this weapon anymore. They’re actively trying to replace it but also don’t want to give up the capability until it is fully replaced.