• Carvex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Probably? This is textbook for these people. Every accusation from Conservatives is an admission of guilt.

    • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In this case, the law could potentially give green light to CP as long as it’s between married couples, as

      1. it has an exception for married couples,
      2. it does not differentiate between porn of consenting adults and of children who cannot consent.

      After seeing many laws that are written in a way they have other effects that are “totally unintended”, I refuse to believe this guy isn’t aware the pedo part of his law. I usually oppose pedojacketing, but in this case it’s not unwarranted.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Federal CP law would still apply, and Christian morality and pratice is already sexually abusive to children even when they’re not outright assaulting them (which also happens a lot)