pinkdrunkenelephants to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agoWhy we cook at home ruleimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up1926arrow-down10cross-posted to: cookathome
arrow-up1926arrow-down1imageWhy we cook at home rulepinkdrunkenelephants to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square164fedilinkcross-posted to: cookathome
minus-squaredoctorcrimson@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 months agoYour point was that a thing which you claim passed did not in fact pass? And I proved that? Clearly I’m arguing with an addict of some sort, hope you get that sorted out.
minus-squareCoreidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoNope. My point is that regardless of who is in office there is no financial reform. It’s the same bullshit regardless of which party is in office. The fact that it wasn’t passed just echos my point. No one in power is interested in real reform. It’s rich vs poor and congress is on the rich side. It’s clear you’re too daft to understand that.
Your point was that a thing which you claim passed did not in fact pass? And I proved that? Clearly I’m arguing with an addict of some sort, hope you get that sorted out.
Nope. My point is that regardless of who is in office there is no financial reform. It’s the same bullshit regardless of which party is in office.
The fact that it wasn’t passed just echos my point. No one in power is interested in real reform. It’s rich vs poor and congress is on the rich side.
It’s clear you’re too daft to understand that.