The ‘Save the Children Convoy’ is struggling as organizers accuse one another of being ‘undercover cops’ or planning ‘violence’ and ‘terrorism’

  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Berry says the convoy wants to save children from the “human trafficking industry,”

    Sounds like pizzagate

    but also from “mandating the shots to kids and kids getting sick

    Anti-vaxx disinformation

    and frigging education and all the stuff they’re teaching them in schools

    Anti-education disinformation

    and the trans agenda [and], gender dysphoria – all of these things.”

    Anti-trans moral panic fueled by disinformation

    he and others have shared graphics claiming “the World Health Organization and the United Nations are instructing elementary schools around the world to have pedophilia normalized.”

    Anti-LGBTQ moral panic fueled by disinformation

    and the math agenda

    Ah yes the tyranny of math

    You know what really helps solve these imaginary issues? Blocking traffic in Canadian cities, inconveniencing random people, and committing acts of terrorism. Brilliant plan, fuckwits. If only they cared about real issues as much as their imaginary ones.


    Oh and then there’s this gem:

    The “Save the Children Convoy,” a spin-off of recent anti-2SLGBTQ+ protests targeting schools and drag storytime events as well as loosely inspired by the controversial film “Sound of Freedom,” is being planned for Toronto in late summer or early fall. …
    This week, reports surfaced that one of the Sound of Freedom’s original funders had been arrested on child kidnapping charges in Missouri.

    “We have met the enemy and they are us.”

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        11 months ago

        My wife just got back from a literal math conference with fellow math researchers. I asked her what the math agenda is and she said snacks & coffee at 10am because everyone was tired from being up early to make it to the conference.

        I’ll let you know if any other nefarious math-based plots are exposed.

        • Wenchette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Lol my daughter teaches math, I’ll find out what she knows and we can compare notes

        • Elderos@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It is so dumb that I would not even consider this line to be good satire. Yet, here we are, they literally hate math because it leads to logic.

    • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I can “understand” what they dislike about everything here except for … math? Like, what? What could anyone possibly have against math?

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Had to google it. Evidently, 2-spirits, (native American tradition of non-binary.) The ever-lengthening acronym keeps growing…

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sexuality is complicated, so apparently is making an acronym that includes everything that’s not cis-straight lol

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I thought everything else was supposed to be covered under the “Q,” but I guess it’s important to some groups that they have their own letter. So, that makes the long-form 2SLGBTQIA+ now? Ugh, that does not roll off the tongue.

            • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              11 months ago

              I feel like the sooner society accepts that sexuality is complex the less letters will need to be added so people feel like they’re represented. I’m all for inclusion but I’d rather see a world where 2slgbtq+ is irrelevant and people are just free to be who they want to be, whatever letter that is

              • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Pretty much. At this stage, I don’t want anyone to feel left out, but after a certain point, trying to define more points on the spectrum of human gender expression and sexuality gets into diminishing returns. Even with the traditional colours of the rainbow, where does blue end and indigo begin? The labels exist to make it easier for people to talk about things and describe the world around us. Unless there is some specific nuance someone is trying to capture, LGBTQ+ should get the point across with the Q and the +. Technically, I think you could get the point across in most use cases with something more succinct than that, but that seems to be what has been established.

                Still, I can totally get that someone can feel left out being lumped into the +, so individual use will and should vary. I still rail against the inefficiencies of common language though. The concept is simple, people who aren’t in the big main hetero & cis sections of the spectrum.

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Amen, when one day sexual preferences are as political as ice cream preferences we will have reached equality.

              • atrielienz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                This is what I’m hoping for in my lifetime. It’s hard to explain but I want healthy sexuality to be so mainstream, and so socially acceptable that it’s boring. That it doesn’t need to be the focal point of a show or a movie or a book or whatever. That people can just be people and we don’t need token characters at all. I want it to be so normal that it’s boring.

            • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              Q is queer or questioning, depending on who you ask. Everyone not in the listed letters is covered under the +.

        • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You know, I’ve always wondered if there’s any animosity from the other groups since they get two letters but everyone else only gets one…

    • moitoi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The theories and basis are always the same for centuries. They only wrapped them with a new tinfoil.