Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agoTipping culture npcslemmy.worldimagemessage-square683fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down1205
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageTipping culture npcslemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square683fedilink
minus-squareformergijoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down13·5 months agoLook at this guy, paying $70 at a restaurant. How many are you buying for? 5?
minus-squarepyrflie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·5 months agoProbably 2, maybe one at a nicer restaurant. If you’re in California or DC it might be lunch.
minus-squaremars@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-25 months agoMy bills for two people regularly come out to $50, at normal unfancy restaurants (sometimes even just fast casual). So $70 would be 3 people for me.
minus-squareVoyajer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoThat’s a pretty normal 2 person meal nowadays, cheap if for 3. I’m not even in a high cost of living area.
minus-squareOgmios@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down6·5 months agoYea, buying a $70 meal then complaining about money being scarce is kinda… questionable.
Look at this guy, paying $70 at a restaurant. How many are you buying for? 5?
Probably 2, maybe one at a nicer restaurant. If you’re in California or DC it might be lunch.
My bills for two people regularly come out to $50, at normal unfancy restaurants (sometimes even just fast casual). So $70 would be 3 people for me.
That’s a pretty normal 2 person meal nowadays, cheap if for 3. I’m not even in a high cost of living area.
Yea, buying a $70 meal then complaining about money being scarce is kinda… questionable.