The US primaries and the general election are two different things. Voting uncommitted in the primary expresses support for the Palestinian plight and does not give Republicans any ground.

The uncommitted movement presents a safe and effective avenue for voters to voice dissatisfaction with President Biden’s policies, particularly with the Israel-Hamas conflict. By doing so in the primary, voters can signal discontent without risking a Republican victory in the general election. The purpose is to send a wake-up call to the Biden administration that it is failing to address issues and effectively engage with the party, vis a vis that Biden is enabling a genocide.

That being said, anyone who calls for an uncommitted or third-party vote in the general election I will personally kick in the gender neutral balls (in Minecraft).

  • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Considering there is no meaningful challenge, the ONLY useful purpose a primary serves is to take the temperature of the party itself and allow it to signal if there are cracks in the base or policies that aren’t resonating outside the head office.

    If we’re just going to have a sham election with 115% turnout and 170% approval vote, why waste the money?

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      As long as there is hope i will vote Democrat in the general. But man, forcing the ambassador to veto a cease fire was a swift kick in the hope sack

    • spujbOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      first paragraph is a fair assessment

      not sure what you are referring to with the second part? i feel out of the loop on something (edit: i now know what you are referring to and i unequivocally disagree. skipping elections in the name of cost savings is almost the worst possible option.)

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        If there’s no second candidate who could win, and everyone is railroaded into a unity response, it seems like a dubious third-world election, where you sometimes see dubious numbers like that.

        Since election operations cost money; we could save a few bucks just anointing Biden today, if we don’t intend to actually parse the primary results to figure out the electorate’s needs.

        • spujbOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          …….no!? lmao?! pls tell me you are joking

          if anything that would make the election more anti-democratic, fascist and (to use your word) third-world. to what, assume the winner of an election and skip it? that is, emphatically, absurd.

          the reason the incumbent always sweeps in their party is already to save money. because it’s more or less pointless for the party to compete against itself when they already have the person they elected in office.

          but it’s still important that the primary happen because a) it’s a safety in case the politician turns out to be bad faith and not represent the wishes of the party (this happened with George Santos iirc) or b) in the very case of this post, where Democratic voters are expressing dissatisfaction with the candidate but do not want to risk a Republican win.

          this is kind of basic US politics, so if you are just hearing about this, no worries. you are wrong and i don’t want to dog on you for that but you might want to do some research and listen to some more experienced leftist commentary. i won’t claim to be the best place to get this info.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m hopeful, in a sick kind of sense, that the horrors of the war in Gaza will break Israel’s stranglehold on US politics.

    They… really have just gone mask off.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m hopeful. I was exceptionally skeptical at the start of this that it would change any large number of opinions in the US, because fuck, it’s been long-ongoing and the Israelis had the convenient excuse of responding to a terror attack.

        But public opinion is shifting much faster than I thought it would as this draws on. We may finally be able to break the Israeli grip on US politics it’s had since the 80s.

  • cheesebag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    All the best political cartoons are chockablock with text. For real though, appreciate the effort.

    • spujbOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      thanks i wouldn’t really label this a cartoon tho since im intentionally coming at this with the goal of nuance. more of a psa or breakdown post.

      my earlier posts on this same position were simpler and immediately devolved into name calling and misinformation in the comments so that this one hasn’t yet i consider a win

      • cheesebag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I wanna get better at GIMP because there’s some good ideas for political cartoons, but I can’t draw 😔

        • spujbOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          i believe in you! also krita is open source and better than gimp for creative stuff

  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Holy shit I did not know it was possible to fit this much mental illness into a single meme.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m voting uncommitted in the primary and then voting for the fucking ghoul we currently have in office in the general election, but could it be any more evident that this is not a democracy? We don’t have any viable choice other than to vote for one candidate. We rightfully criticize nations like Russia for having sham elections, but we have them too.

    Our whole system is bad, our nation is bad, and I’m ashamed to be a US citizen.

  • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can someone explain to me why there isn’t a third track? If we’re so fucking concerned about the threat of another Trump presidency then why aren’t we all registering Republican and making someone else win the primary?

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because tracks don’t appear out of thin air. For all the people screaming “where’s the third track?,” it is never going to appear unless those people start building tracks before the train arrives at the junction.

      The time to start talking about and working to legitimize a third-party candidate isn’t the election cycle; that work has to be done in advance.

      • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not suggesting spinning up a third party, just wondering why reasonable people don’t see the opportunity to register Republican and give Trump the boot. I gave it a shot, but it seems like no one else had the same idea.

        • Wooster@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          The problem is that it would have to be an entire movement. And you’d need to all back the same non-Trump candidate. Without that unity it’s spinning wheels in the mud.

    • spujbOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      don’t think i can do your first question justice (though looking up the spoiler effect is a good start) but for the second:

      such manipulation of the primary, while theoretically possible and legal (not a lawyer), would take massive concentrated effort and messaging (and therefore money) to coordinate successfully, and would be entirely unprecedented. the system is broken, yes, but is generally foolproof enough to make such manipulation impractical in the real world.

      edit: another fact i forgot to mention. it’s almost certainly too late as the primaries are well on their way and complete in some states.

      • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        It doesn’t take any money or coordination to decide to vote for someone other than Trump in the Republican primary, and anyone can do it. Apparently voting for Biden or ‘noncommitted’ in the not-really-contested Democratic primary was a higher priority than resisting fascism.

        • spujbOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          …? no. flat out wrong.

          you are asking millions to entirely change their voter registration to a different party and then unanimously pick one candidate that is better than Trump and win.

          to communicate that would cost more in funds than the Republican party spends in campaign advertising altogether.

          the “uncommitted” movement works because it doesn’t have to be unanimous; only a handful have to do it to be effective

          • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Is changing your party affiliation difficult or cumbersome in other states? I did it in about three minutes, wasn’t a big deal at all.

            If millions of people did the same, they wouldn’t need to vote for the same candidate, just anyone but Trump. Literally anyone else they could vote for would be an improvement, even if they went on to win the general.

            • spujbOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              ok go for it lol. try to convince millions of voters to become republicans on paper. better have a good candidate who is running as well. oh and you might want to have a plan for the states who have already selected their nominees.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    You know how you mock and deride anti-trump conservatives who buckle under, kiss the ring and endorse Trump anyway, despite railing about how terrible he is?

    Why don’t you feel the same way about anti-Biden progressives who do the same?