• CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s not how the ADA works. You could say the same for wheelchair ramps, but ultimately it’s on the store owner to reasonably provide accomodations to people who want to use their services. It’s not on the disabled person to pick and select who will accommodate them or not. It’s why businesses are required to reserve a portion of their parking lot to those with handicap placards. It shouldn’t be up to each disabled person to figure out which business they can go to.

    What Starbucks is doing would be akin to Walmart charging an extra buck for you to use one of their mobility scooters or an extra $5 if you require the assistance from an employee because you can’t reach something.

    • nolefan33@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know the ins and outs of the ADA, but I disagree with your analogy. What Starbucks is doing is akin to Walmart charging a different price for milk and oat milk, which I don’t think anyone would say is not allowed. It’s not like there’s a sheet of lactose you have to walk through to get into a Starbucks or anything, there’s just things on the menu that people with some food allergies can’t order.

    • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Lactose intolerance is not a disability.

      You cant sue Five Guys because you have a peanut allergy and they didn’t provide you a safe peanut free environment.

      You can’t sue McDonald’s because they don’t have a non dairy cheese replacement for your cheeseburger.