• AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Third parties need to prove viability at a smaller scale before the presidency is realistic. As misguided as the Free State Project was, at least they tried doing it in the right order.

    • joostjakob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Third parties make little sense as long as you have a first passed the post system. Change to proportional representation and you’ll get more choice automatically.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If a third party gets 5% of the national vote, they are entitled to federal funding the next election. Granted, it’s not a huge amount, but it gives them a seat at the table and would be a big first step at ending the two party system. A third party vote is not as useless as you make it out to be. The goal isn’t winning, it’s just getting 5%.

      Now, personally I don’t think that will ever happen. Closest we got was in 2016 with the libertarian party getting 3.2%. I don’t think people are as willing to vote 3rd party these days.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Closest we got was in 2016 with the libertarian party getting 3.2%.

        Ross Perot got almost 20% in 1992 and ~8% in 1996 and the Reform party has gone nowhere since then.

    • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The fact you’ve heard of the Free State Project is kind of impressive actually. I don’t pay that much attention to it, but if I ever got to the point where I thought it would work, I’d be moving there.