• rubpoll [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is like if the Confederacy retreated to Catalina Island, massacred everyone there, and continued calling itself the rightful government of the entire continent afterward.

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is not like that. The ROC government did not “massacre everyone there.” It did call itself the rightful government of the entire China for several decades, but it has since then moved on.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Man, these days you know a hexbear without even looking at the user.

      I mean this is complete baloney! You are also using the comparison to establish some kind of “evil slavers vs democracy” narrative that wasn’t in place at all in China during the warlord era. They were all equally horrid.

      This is, at best, akin to a war between all states in the US after the Boston Tea Party and a communist state, let’s just pick Arizona, slowly winning the wars and forcing the remaining faction onto Hawaii. Then the socialist party forced anyone who could read, more or less, to work themselves to death in a field in the name of communism. Glory to the people!!!

      • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        jesus christ read at least one book about the history of the conflict you’re describing before you confidently spout nonsense.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I agree my characterisation is far off the mark. But the poster I responded to wasn’t even in the same galaxy, so I still considered it an improvement.

          Also, I’m not Jesus Christ 🤪

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            So you acknowledge the fact that you don’t know shit about the topic you’re spouting off on but you still just assume you know better??

            • randint@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              They did not say that they don’t know shit about the topic, not even close. They simply said their characterization is far off the marks. That means that their understanding of the conflict is far from perfect, but they absolutely do know shit about it.

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                They didn’t say they were wrong

                They just said they were far off the mark

                That means their understanding is far from perfect

                They absolutely do know their shit

                  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    far off the mark

                    Can it be time for you to shut up yet?

                    To think that you saw me make fun of you for the game of telephone you played with yourself and decided to take the final translation and defend yourself with it. Way to miss the fucking point. “Far from the mark” was already cope by someone who was simply fucking wrong about what they said.

      • Fuckass [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        So in your hypothetical analog, a completely made up, random, nonexistent party that never had any relevancy during that time period takes over America, and somehow you know more than OP and that proves china bad

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I agree. People should take how the Chinese government and the US government treat their people into consideration.

        • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          So are we gonna talk about how USA has the highest incarceration rate in the world? Are we going to talk about income equality in USA vs China? Are we going to talk about the Concentration camps for refugee children on the USA border? (If you are going to bring up Xinjiang I’m going to need some photographic evidence beyond vibes and zenz doing bad statistical analysis)

          • randint@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            What does incarceration rate have to do with how good the country is? Do you really believe that the income is more equal in China? If you are going to talk about the “concentration camps” on the USA border I’m going to need photo evidence too. Here is a photo of the camp in Xinjiang:

            ::: spoiler :::

            No, this photo is not fake.

            • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              What does incarceration rate have to do with how good the country is?

              not “how good it is” “How it treats its people” America locks up its people way more (531/100k) than other China (119/100k). Is imprisoning people treating them well?

              Kids in cages. There’s some photo’s there and I think you’ll probably respect WaPo as a source.

              removed externally hosted image

              You can try again but I’m gonna guess that it is just a picture of a building or some prisoners with no context on how many people are there or why they are there.

              • randint@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I apologize for saying “how good it is.” I was in a rush and couldn’t think of a better phrase.

                I just read through the article from the Washington Post you linked. That really is bad and I believe that the Trump government should not have treated the (although illegal) immigrants. The grim appearance of that facility really isn’t something that the immigrants should have faced when they set foot on the US. However, compare that to the situation in Xinjiang. Here is an opinion post from the Washington Post. What China is doing to its Uyghurs is genocide. Not that it justifies anything that the US have done to its immigrants, but in comparison what the US is doing seem pretty mild.

                • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Here is an opinion post from the Washington Post.

                  that’s not news that is an opinion piece that references Zenz who is a liar and Nazi sympathiser.

                  The UN has done a fact finding Mission and they said there is no evidence of a Uyghur Genocide. It didn’t happen.

                  Yes there are Vocational schools in Xinjiang but that is to teach people trades to lift themselves out of poverty. The only “culture” being erased is religious extremist terrorism that snuck in through Afghanistan when USA pushed the Taliban out of Afghanistan. Yes there was a rapid increase in birth control measures in Xinjiang but that is what happens when women are given education, economic self determination, and access to proper medical care. They get a IUD so they can focus on living their lives the way they want to instead of being slaves to men who use them as domestic servants and baby incubators.

                  Zenz based his entire “genocide” theory off statistics and bad math because he is involved in the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation. It is an organization built to spread hate against communism. They hate Communism because the USSR killed 7/10 nazis that died in WW2. The large majority of “Victims of Communism” were Nazis and the people memorializing them are nazis too.

                  • randint@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    that’s not news that is an opinion piece

                    I literally stated that in my comment. You even quoted it.

                    [Zenz] is a liar and Nazi sympathiser

                    I just clicked that link and, wow, that tweet was quite stupid. He should not have said that. What the Nazis did was unexcusable. However, please keep this in mind - that being a Nazi sympathizer does not automatically invalidate one’s opinions on other topics.

                    The UN has done a fact finding Mission and they said there is no evidence of a Uyghur Genocide. It didn’t happen.

                    China is one of the five most powerful members of the UN (the permanent members of the security council). Though the security council does not have much to do with the investigation directly, there is no gainsaying that China has had a certain degree of influence. It is entirely possible that the UN decided to overlook their crimes due to pressure from China.

                    Yes there are Vocational schools in Xinjiang. […] and baby incubators.

                    When I told you that the Xinjiang camps are committing genocide or when you saw Zenz claiming the same how did you feel? You were thinking that I gobbled up and regurgitated all the US propaganda and that this is just a conspiracy theory because I couldn’t give concrete proof, weren’t you? This is also exactly how I feel toward your claims except that the propaganda you gobbled up were Chinese. Besides, I am pretty sure that when women are given more education, they decide not to have so many children either by using condoms or having less sex rather than getting IUDs.

                • carl_marks_1312 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  No offence but your lack of media literacy is showing…

                  You understand that using WaPo as a source for American wrong doings is not the same as using WaPo as a source for wrong doings it’s geopolitical rival. You’d need a Chinese outlet admitting to their faults for it to be equivalent…

                  Nonetheless I clicked on your link:

                  The disclosure comes in an investigative report from the Associated Press and a new research report by scholar Adrian Zenz for the Jamestown Foundation.

                  Literally the second paragraph…

                  • randint@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I hope I don’t sound rude but it really sounds like you only consider WaPo trustworthy when it’s convenient for you. Besides, the media in China are heavily controlled by the government. I don’t think a news outlet would survive if they dared to report such things.

                    Literally the second paragraph…

                    Sorry, I don’t understand how that makes this any less trustworthy?

      • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nobody in SEA likes Taiwan. It doesn’t help that Taiwan has two naval bases in the South China Sea and always sides with the PRC against the rest of SEA over the SCS, mostly using the justification of “acktually the SCS is part of Chinese naval waters and we’re officially called the Republic of China, so this is Taiwanese naval waters btw since we’re officially called the Republic of China.”

    • randint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is that a bad thing? In your hypothetical situation, Chinese people should be happy about their government selling weaponry to Texas, and the Americans should not support their sale of weaponry. To compare this to the real world scenario, Chinese people should feel angry about this and Americans should feel good. I don’t really get the point you’re trying to convey with your analogy.