• lipilee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    while i’m obviously sure it’s a bluff, pulling out instead of selling would be the clearest admittance that tiktok is (or at that point: was) not about the profit, but about Chinese influence in the US. the message being “we rather leave a hudred billion dollars on the table than give away our surveillance technology to some US company.”

    but yeah, they will def. sell if they need to.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are valid commercial reasons not to go through a forced sale with a ticking time limit, which will inevitably carry a steeply discounted price. Rather than getting robbed, it makes sense to hang on to the company and take profits from the rest of the world.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s more like their US profits are no match for their Chinese profits. Social media use in China and other Asian countries dwarfs US use.