• BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    You know I love the idea of cryostasis, and the idea of reanimating people after death is great.

    But why the fuck would future humans bother bringing all these people back, even if they could? Even if they have a utopian society free of scarcity and inequality, they would be bringing back mostly rich people who lived in a super different and bad time and have literally nothing positive to contribute to the utopian future, since they were a large part of the problems of today in the first place. Plus the vast majority of them are almost certainly elitist assholes who nobody in a utopia would want to be around.

    Maybe it would be a humanitarian thing, but if these people are dead and frozen there’s no real imperative to do this to end suffering or something. Or I guess maybe bringing them back to try and figure out what the hell their damage is that they felt ruining everything was a better option than working toward the betterment of all… but they’d only need a few brains in vats for that, no bodies, so sucks to suck, cryofolks.

    If future humans don’t have a utopian society, the only real use for people from so long ago that I can come up with would be research subjects or slaves. And frankly there are easier ways to go about getting those…

    So I see no possible future where people who cryopreserve get brought back en masse. Even if it’s entirely possible to surmount the technical hurdles.

    • clara@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      why would future humans bother bringing all these people back

      i think it’s worth reminding why doctors treat people now, in this time and space. they do it mostly because they want to save people. maybe a few do it for money, but past a certain point, the money isn’t why you do it. i think it’s a safe bet that doctors of a future would see these corpses as patients, and act accordingly. an analogy - think how we see heart attack victims as patients, and not how our medieval ancestors would have seen them (as corpses)

      …literally nothing positive to contribute to the utopian future…

      true, but, a good chunk of patients in hopsital today have nothing to contribute to society, and cannot contribute any more, whatsoever. we treat them anyway, because that’s what we do. humans have consistently cared for others that are sick and have “nothing to contribute” throughout history, and that shows no sign of going away anytime soon

      • Eigerloft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        He actually appeared again in a later episode in a couple TNG novelizations.

        He managed to adapt and fit in to Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism, but eventually was called on to use his 1900s business prowess in negotiations becoming Earth’s Ambassador to Ferenginar, and then eventually was named the Secretary of Commerce for at least two different Earth Presidents.

        *edit, I lied. I’m sorry for misleading you all, you gave me your trust and I squandered it.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Medical research from before whatever plague or virus infects everybody.

      Don’t they have problems today studying effects of microplastics because they can’t find a control group of humans who don’t have microplastics in them?

      Though that’s a pretty grim future for the rich frozen elite.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      But why the fuck would future humans bother bringing all these people back, even if they could?

      Because they don’t have rights, so no one will care when we upload their brains into street sweeping robots. If you’re lucky, you’ll get uploaded into an interstellar probe.

      • EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Someone should write a book about that, or even a series of books. A series I should reread before the 5th book comes out.

      • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lucky? From some of the other comments it sounds like you may be referencing something, but just taking the comment at face value, there is no way that is not the most horrific fate I can possibly imagine.

        Assuming you’re not conscious the entire time and only ‘wake up’ when you enter a solar system to study, it’s still horrific. You wake up, completely alone. You have no body and cannot move, and your attention is directed toward gathering data on some distant points of light. When you understand what’s going on, sure, there’s a bit of a sense of wonder…but it quickly becomes tedium, maddening, isolated tedium, as you slowly drift through a star system, gathering data on each planet and its star, over the course of fifty years or so. There’s certainly bits of interesting stuff, but we are still talking insane levels of isolation and boredom. Assuming you’re somehow prevented from going insane by the software in order to keep you functional, you can’t even escape into madness.

        …and then we imagine what happens if you aren’t shown the mercy of being conscious only during the few decades the probe is drifting through a solar system. What if you’re conscious the. entire. time. Once you’re in deep interstellar space, you’re alone. Able to think, perceive, experience, but in an unchanging, static existence. A year passes, and everything is so close to exactly the same that only with the precision of the measurements your tools can take can you determine there’s been any change. Ten years pass, then a hundred, a thousand. You drift, slowly, through interstellar space toward a destination impossibly far away, all while you wait, conscious, unable to die, unable to escape into madness, just…eternal…waiting. Until thankfully you finally enter a target solar system, get a few blessed decades of what, to your new perspective, seems like frantic activity. Something, finally, to do, to see, that actually changes. And then…you drift back out into interstellar space after a few gravity-assisted slingshots around this star system’s worlds, only to proceed on to your next destination, another several thousand year journey away.

        This is, by far, the most horrific imaginable torture.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          https://www.goodreads.com/series/192752-bobiverse

          You have the entire wealth of human knowledge to consume in your journey, you can “frame jack” so the rate at which you experience time is variable, you have access to atomic 3D Printers, you were an engineer in your previous life, so after studying up on every science, you invent FTL communication. You also do a few things like cloning yourself, terraforming planets, saving the human race a few times, saving alien races once or twice.

          It’s a good book series.

    • practisevoodoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ever read Transmetropolitan? It has a whole sub-arc on just the absolute lack of concern that a future society would have for this resurrection obligation/burden imposed on them.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        A friend of mine is so much a fan of Transmetropolitan that he has a spider tattoo on his head in the same place.

        He kinda looks like the character to begin with, but with the ink and a bit of cosplay, combined with a shitty fake accent, it’s almost like he sprang from the pages lol

    • daltotron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      we’d do it cause it’d be funny even if they weren’t tortured or nothing. can you imagine a little asshole running around the utopia being like “no, no, I’m supposed to own things, where are my stocks, where are my numbers, no!”. probably it’d suck that all their friends are deade though. I’m sure you thaw a couple cause the have rare diseases or certain kinds of DNA though.

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Soon as those hurdles are surmounted, armies will train then freeze conscripts. Only thawing when they need meat for the grinder, or when better weapons come out that need more training.

      That’s the only way they get brought back en masse.

      • TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is literally what happens to Helldivers in Helldivers 2. As much as I enjoy the game I’d rather not have Super Earth become a reality.

      • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        That sounds like slaves with extra steps, so that tracks with my thoughts.

        Tho that seems like a massively dystopian waste of resources when they could just build robots, which surely they will be able to do if they can reanimate humans.

        So yeah, that’s likely.

        • exocrinous@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Humans are easier to indoctrinate than sapient robots, because human biases are predictable.

          Fascist politician: the Jews are stealing your money to cause the downfall of your race! They’re even breeding your children with black people to destroy you!

          Human reaction: yeah, that makes sense

          Robot reaction: …why tho?

          Robots may still have biases, but they probably won’t be exactly the same as a human’s. I doubt a robot would care for a “think of the children” argument

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think they’re frozen before they’re dead, so the reason to bring them back would be to not do that murder thing, and also to fulfill contractual obligations, and as a business showcase to the world that you’re ready to receive more customers for a freeze and bring you back service instead of a freeze and kill you service.

      • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        Admittedly I don’t know much about cryopreservation (looked into it many years ago as a curiosity) but my understanding, and the article says the same, is that they clinically die first and then it’s a rush to preserve them before too much breakdown happens. Since it’s quite expensive, most people only preserve their brain or head, which is removed before being frozen. I’m not sure legally they would be able to do this pre-death, since the harvesting/preserving would directly cause death as we currently understand and classify it, and assisted euthanasia of any flavor is illegal in most places.

    • CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I once read a sci-fi story (I don’t recall the title) that posed the same question you are asking. The short answer is “Historians would want to revive at least some of the frozen”.

      Also, assuming mass media entertainment still exists in the future, I can see a reality show being created where someone is revived and cameras follow him around as he tries to adapt to the future.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably by some deal of interest on a trust that is forfeit if the tech exists and they don’t get reanimated. Money and a protective cocoon of law and beaurocracy gets it done. I am sure they (or their lawyers) had already considered your argument.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m for reaimmating them to have them stand trial for their crimes. I’m hopeful for a brighter future, but I’m also hopeful people won’t lose their unrelenting pettiness. It’s part of what makes us human.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        But most societies that would try them will have prisons so nice that they make our prisons look like medieval prisons.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, if their society is more advanced so will be their justice. I’m ok with that.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Why would a society bring people back to life when they [describes why you think they deserve to die]”

      Happy to know you’re not going to be solely responsible for bringing them back!

    • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Humans are particularly difficult to preserve because of the delicate structure in (most of) our heads.

      Nonsense. We are just too big to be frozen quickly enough that no ice crystals emerge. Every living thing turns to slush if frozen normally.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nelson and the mortician then spent the entire night figuring out how to jam four people — who may or may not have suffered thaw damage — into the capsule. The arrangement of bodies in different orientations was described as a “puzzle.” After finding an arrangement that worked, the resealed capsule was lowered into an underground vault at the cemetery. Nelson claimed to have refilled it sporadically for about a year before he stopped receiving money from the relatives. After a while, he let the bodies thaw out inside the capsule and left the whole thing festering in his vault.

      Grooooooooosssssss

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ever seen DMSO solidify upon cooling? I wouldn’t even call it vitrification, it obviously has macroscopically large crystalline domains. It would be like putting rocks in your veins. I mean it kind of works fine for single cells because the failures* can be treated as a statistic, but anything on the scale of organs will become damaged just too badly.

      * See e.g. what happens to frozen sperm cells: “chromatin disruption through protamine translocations, DNA fragmentation, and lesions to genes involved in fertilization capability and embryonic development […] are known consequences of the cryopreservation process.”

  • dumbass@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reminds me of the time when I was younger, scrolling rotten.com and came across that picture of the dude who died in the bath, but had this thing that kept the water warm, so he just turned into a giant human stew.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    A couple days ago my milk was all chunky when I tried to pour it in my cereal, because refrigerated air that was supposed to go to the fridge got blocked.

    Milk wasn’t expired, just went bad due to a random mechanical issue over the course of the length of time the milk was being preserved.

    Anyway, what’s all this about cryogenics?

  • some pirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reminds me of the Egyptian aristocracy, they would be pissed off if they knew their 4000 yo mummy will end up getting shown at a museum or destroyed by a tomb raider. But what would happen if they managed to revive them today, probably a temporary experiment on a lab, the pharaoh just lived in a closed environment for a couple of months and for most of modern day people it would be just some science news they scrolled by on tiktok

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 months ago

      How about being ground up into powder and put into medicine? I’m sure they’d love that one.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      One of the more interesting aspects of history is the progression from the notion of a very limited and inaccessible resurrection of a body to the idea of a very accessible resurrection of the spirit/mind.

      The latter is IMO probably best embodied (pun intended) in one of the early Christian apocrypha from a group that was known for rejecting the canonical focus on a physical resurrection of a body:

      Whoever drinks from my mouth will become like me; I myself shall become that person, and the hidden things will be revealed to him.

      • Gospel of Thomas saying 108

      It’s such a wild march of progress from kings trying to preserve their bodies to a tradition rejecting the Eucharist of consumption of a body in favor of a Eucharistic consumption of words and ideas to resurrect the essence of the individual.

      And looking back from an age where we are literally seeing patents granted to trillion dollar companies around resurrecting the dead digitally, the “resurrection of words and ideas” crowd was more on to a practical tract of thinking than the “resurrect my goop” crowd.

      In fact, the Egyptians when embalming themselves discarded their brains thinking it was garbage filling of the skull. Not exactly the best strategy in hindsight.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doing a quick read up on Wikipedia, my memoories on Egyptian mummies’ brains getting removed was correct. That alone would mean the best they could achieve is cloning, without any memory retention.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        destroyed by a tomb raider

        *And not even a sexy, big POINTY breasted one with skintight shirt and very short shorts.

        OG Lara, or nothing!

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I remember when i was a kid hearing about people being frozen like this. Even back then i figured the only thing the richies were buying was false hope. But though it gives me a bit of schadenfreude to see it fail (if i can’t be immortal too, feel me?), i get the urge to at least try to beat the odds. Even if it’s only a 0.000001% chance to beat death, who wouldn’t go all in if they had the means?

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I have the urge to absolutely make sure I dont accidentally increase the odds of my survival.
      Tho being turned into a fine smooth soup of heavy metal(s) and plastics sounds kind of a funny last request (but especially then I would have def ran out of fucks, you know, a compostable trash bag is fine).

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thanks for this. Quite gruesome, but not at all unexpected. I remember having a conversation with a friend of mine a while back, where I made the argument that water expands when frozen and, since humans are mostly water, freezing a human would crack every vital organ. I’m actually upset to discover I was right.

      • TheHooligan95@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        there could be a way maybe, by freezing water while keeping it extremely pressurized (extremely), you can make “efficient ice” that occupies less space, called ice VII, I’m not kidding. It would cost literally billions of dollars so not yet feasible, but it keeps my sci-fi loving mind at ease.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Flash freezing can work, but it’s almost impossible for something as large as a human body.

        • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Cryoprotectants also do this pretty efficiently – they prevent crystallization, which leads to “vitreous” ice, which has more or less the same structure as liquid water and so doesn’t expand much. I think they do use that when freezing people, but the problem is that even if you fill the blood vessels with pure ethylene glycol, it diffuses very slowly, and it takes hours to get into cells which are far from large blood vessels. They dont diffuse the cryoprotectant in that thoroughly, though, because that’d take so long the body would have started to decay too much.

          Edit: oops, the article talks about vitrifying agents. They make it sound like they’re not effective, but as I said above, they’re very effective if you can get them in every nook and cranny of every cell, which is a losing battle.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Normally yes, because you can’t do more for nature & people than that.

        But in this case it’s just too late, the rich already turned into regular (tho toxic) meat as it neared the end of its life.

        Now, if you get a regular not-about-to-die rich and turn it into a smoothie, then yes, vegan gazpacho.

  • Shadowq8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is it an expensive thing to do ? Can only rich people do it ? I want to buy freezers and sell people into being cryogenically frozen, but affordable

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, it is expensive, as your freezer has to be set at temperatures below -80°C/-112°F, down to -196°C/-321°F, and maintained this way for decades without single interruption.

      This requires expensive equipment and draws insane amounts of power, and also necessitates multiple power backups.

      There is currently no way to do it on a budget.

      • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is currently no way to do it on a budget.>

        Launch the capsule into space in an orbit around earth that’s always obscure from the sun?

        Not a “budget” option but definitely a hell lot cheaper in the long run (decades, or even centuries).

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          TIL things still get hot in space under direct sunlight. I always assumed space would be cold even in sunlight but apparently not.

          anyway, I would think you could still be in a sunlit orbit as long as you had a reflective shield for shading. You’ll probably still need power to maintain temps and monitor status, so solar energy would still be helpful.

          • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fun fact! During the Apollo flights to and from the Moon, the spacecraft would perform “Passive Thermal Control” or “barbecue roll” where it would rotate around its long axis about once per hour, to distribute the thermal load from the sun and keep one side from heating up too much

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Is there such an orbit? That should be an orbit with a period of 1 year, which is far outside Earth’s sphere of gravitational influence.

      • set_secret@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you read the article that explains it this is incorrect. Once it’s set up it requires no power, only liquid nitrogen. So it’s black out proof too.

        You’re not ‘frozen’ you’re ‘vitrified’, the main difference being your cells don’t get damaged (as much)

      • set_secret@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also there is currently a way to do it on a budget, see aforementioned article.

        (basically you can do it with a life insurance plan of around 40 a month if you’re reasonably young).

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Aside from cost there’s also the issue of law, requiring people die of natural causes beforehand means most people will turn to soup before their brain can have any hope of being preserved.


      I have cynicism for lots of things involved here, but if I had the option from some shady person who seems like they are capable and vaguely aligned with me I’d probably take the chance especially if we could make some sort of a post-revival agreement. What a brain (put into a small machine and ideally alongside symbiotic systems) can do for the people who are still alive. Probably with my brain in a jar living in VR until the details are worked out.

      And if it doesn’t work out that way, well… That’s gooood soup!