• cybersin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are we talking truly autonomous vehicles with no driver, or today’s “self-driving-but-keep-your-hands-on-the-wheel” type cars?

      In the case of the former, it should be absolutely the fault of the manufacturer.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You could definitely put some blame on the manufacturer, but in legalize you “knew or should have known” that there was a possiblity that your vehicle could hurt or kill someone. You sent it out into the world without a driver in it, not the manufacturer. I wouldn’t be surprised to see warnings and agreements attached to autonomous vehicles telling people that there is risk.

        • cybersin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Say there is a car with no human driver, that is being sold as requiring “no human input other than set destination, stop, and go”.

          If that vehicle crashes, you think the person who bought the car (the passenger) has legal liability, and not the manufacturer?

          That’s like being a passenger on a bus and getting sued if the bus driver hits a parked car.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The bus company gets sued because they own the bus, not the driver. Same as if you lend your car to someone, you’re at least partially responsible.