• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You said:

    I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.

    Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Pretty sure this guy is some kind of troll, especially because of the weird grammar. Reporting him and moving on.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was violence at Jan 6, ergo Jan 6 was 100% violent.

      Unless you’re saying there was no violence at BLM then you’re saying it was 100% violent.

      I’m saying it was near 0%.

      Is that clear enough for you or do you need me to clarify something?