Because of your comment, I did a quick google search and pretty much every source says that .tar.gz is also pretty ancient and not that good (from a compression point of view). For better compression, you can use the xz or 7zip formats. The former is more used on Linux, if that’s what you’re using.
ZIP files are easier to repair and recover files from, and instead of complicating things with 2 containers, it has a table list of files, plus is the easiest to drag drop files into. 7z is a lot better to use than TAR + *z or whatever else. RAR if you want recovery records.
I do NOT understand how zip is still the default. I use .tgz wherever I can.
Because of your comment, I did a quick google search and pretty much every source says that .tar.gz is also pretty ancient and not that good (from a compression point of view). For better compression, you can use the xz or 7zip formats. The former is more used on Linux, if that’s what you’re using.
Lzo or lzma is best for compression. Also depends on the compression rate. KDE Ark is awesome
Nono, z-standard is where it’s at
No, ZST is pretty bad compared to LZMA2, BSC or PAQ*. ZST is middle of the pack between LZ4 and LZMA2, and is only good for transit, not archival.
ZIP files are easier to repair and recover files from, and instead of complicating things with 2 containers, it has a table list of files, plus is the easiest to drag drop files into. 7z is a lot better to use than TAR + *z or whatever else. RAR if you want recovery records.