• acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    You have a point, but consider:

    1. Wood doesn’t preserve well.
    2. It’s unlikely they used anything more than a crude raft to transport them.
    3. The wood from the raft was likely reused after they were done using it anyway.
    • xionzui@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also, they recently discovered a written record from a crew that was transporting some of the stone by boat using artificial waterways that were dug near Giza and filled during the yearly flood of the Nile.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have a hard time seeing a raft as having the necessary water displacement capability to handle that kind of weight, thought. And they left a written record regarding much smaller craft; so one obvious question, where’s the record of any more advanced ship building?

      I guess it’s just the fact that it’s actually really not easy at all to get such enormous chunks of stone to float. But, I also cannot offer any other explanation, so take that as you will…

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I thought about these two factors too, and they bug me.

        Clearly there is a way to build a boat that can carry the equivalent of one of those massive blocks. It would have a massive amount of wood and some clever engineering. Whether they knew how or even if the waterways were deep enough for them to go through…

        Could it be this was the technological leap that allowed the the big pyramids to be built, and why they stand so much taller than the others? Could it be the knowledge didn’t last long and whatever written record got lost to time? It’s a lot of conjecture.

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh, I totally agree with your views here, I think. I guess it just bothers me whenever I see some “obvious” solution on some article or headline. The ones who built these monuments achieved something truly incredible, and we still can’t explain how they did so.