I’m sorry - this is just fucking stupid. Cars are becoming way too bogged down with shit like this that acts like a hovering parent who nags you constantly while having to know where you are all the time.
I want to crash my car into a brick wall every time it makes me click “okay” to the full screen warning that tells me it is my responsibility to keep my eyes on the road. Yeah, no shit, you fucking wanker.
deleted by creator
The California Senate has passed SB 961, which would require “passive speed limiters” to be installed in all new cars manufactured or sold in the Golden State by 2032.
They wouldn’t be liable for speeders anyways that’s criminal misuse by a third party. Just like how Craftsman isn’t to blame when someone gets hit with a wrench. And there are lawful purposes for vehicles that can travel more than the state’s speed limit, like racing on tracks or when rushing to a hospital in an emergency.
This is such a stupid fucking timeline. No shit the manufacturers aren’t responsible for the driving behavior of the drivers. Ugh! Like, get a fucking clue.
We just got an electric car that does this and it’s annoying as fuck because it often messes up the speed limit and tells you that you are going too fast even though you are not.
My thoughts exactly. There’s no way it’s going to be correct for every situation. It can’t take into account changing road conditions.
It’s not even just the changing conditions. It just has wrong speed limit data in some areas and spmetimes it says there is work being done on the road where there isnt and similar
If this passes in California, all their highways will just be a steady sound of vehicles horns.
deleted by creator
Be that as it may, I like his thought of a freeway just honking along like cicadas. My god it would be magnificently annoying.
You just reminded me of this. Fun if you’re driving, but it’s apparently driving people in local villages mad.
At least that one is in tune, unlike others.
the headline is very misleading. There is no beeping at other drivers, or honking of horns.
Just a notification to you, the driver of your own car if your car a) knows the local speed and b) is exceeding it by a set amount.
This notification can be disabled.
like, if you’re in a 30 zone, and go 35, your satnav/gps will go “ding!” and a small light will go on the dash/lcd screen.
California freeways are 65mph. Unless there is traffic, most drivers tend to go around 80mph. They will be constant.
In my opinion, this is trying to tackle the issue in a poor manner. People who are speeding already know that they are, so it’s not like a beep or visual warning is going to cause them to change their behavior. It’s trying to force a technical solution to a non-technical issue.
I just can’t wait to see how quickly someone finds a way to bypass this nanny bullshit.
Unless there is traffic, most drivers tend to go around 80mph.
And they aren’t constantly getting into accidents? Wild. Someone should tell the politicians that this might not be the source of the problem.
And they aren’t constantly getting into accidents?
Nope. The major freeways in California are giant 8 lane straight lines. You could drive 100 mph on them and be perfectly safe. You can see 5 miles ahead of you, and there are no curves or anything to fuck you up. The 65 mph speed limit is just there so that they can write speeding tickets whenever they want more money.
What’s ridiculous is that the freeways can obviously handle and are safe at 80 mph, because millions of people drive 80 mph on them every day. So why not just raise the speed limit to 80 and actually enforce the limit on a regular basis? I’ll tell you why. It’s because they want to be able to go out and write tickets whenever they want more money in their budget, and they want to be able to pull people over on a whim. It’s hella nefarious.
Getting information is “nanny”?
Information by itself, no.
Having something constantly watch my behavior and nag me when I’m being “bad” is, yes.
It’s not “watching your behaviour”. Nor is it “nagging”. It’s beeping when a speed is reached. Quit hyperventilating
There’s a really good way to reduce speeding without dumb moves like this. Design the road for the speed you want. Most roads in the US are created first without speed limit concerns, only labeling them based on a weird metric of how fast cars drive through them. Then if they are going too fast, governments just put up more warning signs and call it a day.
There are many techniques in the road design handbook that can be used to make drivers subconsciously slow down for their own perceived safety. And it works! So let’s do more of that and less of this “make car beep” nonsense.
Hollister, CA tried to implement one of those designs and it was comically horrible. Look it up. The stupidest fucking road I’ve ever seen. Made you drive like a drunk person on what otherwise is 25-35mph residential super straight road.
Yeah absolutely fucking not. I control my car, not your fucking legislative whims!
But you are (statistically, assuming you are living in the USA) really bad at it. Maybe you shouldn’t control your car.
Or maybe we need laws more like Germany because I’ll pass all those tests and be glad to see the failures taking public transport.
You would pass all those tests, every idiot does. The harder task is to learn, that cars shouldn’t be driven by every idiot who passes those tests - even if you are allowed to do so.
I’m gonna just guess you’ve never heard of Germany.
Germany is basically Russia, so who cares. Go Trump!
I’m opening an auto shop to make the beep sound change to “hell yeah, brother!”
the faster you go the louder “free bird” by lynryd skynryd plays
People will just pull whatever fuse it’s on, or find a bypass
They won’t even hear it over the Netflix they’re watching on their phones.
On the phones? Friend, we have huge-ass screens in cars now. With 7.1 sound system
Good bless the Chinese engineers that created the head unit I got for my car off eBay! That thing is incredible
They’ll put it on the same fuse that powers your ignition or some shit, so you can’t pull it, just like they’ve done to the fuses responsible for them sending all their massively intrusive tracking information back to the company.
Fuckin snitch ass state i live in
WTAF?
Reading about state legislatures is always wild. They always use moon logic when debating and rarely mention the actual content of the bill. Driver deaths are spiking due to greater instances of inebriation on the road therefore to fix it the State of California needs to be able to track all drivers via GPS. Makes sense to me, why not.
- (a) As used in this article, “passive intelligent speed assistance system” means an integrated vehicle system that uses, at minimum, the GPS location of the vehicle compared with a database of posted speed limits, to determine the speed limit, and utilizes a brief, one-time visual and audio signal to alert the driver each time they exceed the speed limit by more than 10 miles per hour.
My favorite part of that is “what database?” If it’s local, who is responsible for updating it and how often. If it’s remote, who is responsible for updating it, how often and who pays for the connectivity costs and equipment?
Also since it’s GPS based, does this mean all new cars in CA will come with free Nav systems? (I know, I know)
My vehicle already displays the speed limit on the dash. This could be met with a firmware update. Doesn’t say anything about sharing that information, it just needs to send a beep and flash a light to the driver one time. Kind of misleading to say that California will be tracking drivers. They’re just trying to require a new annoyance in cars, similar to the one that beeps if your seat belt isn’t buckled.
deleted by creator
If they could automate vehicles this wouldn’t be an issue. The current tech isn’t there so what if we put them on tracks so they can’t crash? We could make them bigger so lots of people could go at the same time and fewer vehicles would be on the road. You wouldn’t even have to own it, they could have a regular schedule so you know where and when to ride in one!
Nah, that will never work. Beeping at a driver occasionally though, that will fix things.
Removed by mod
Did op change the title? That’s pretty much what it says right now
beep = sounding your horn. In the USA, they use the term “beeping the horn”.
this doesn’t have anything to do with the horn.
I’ve personally only heard “honking the horn” (like as in “honk if you’re horny”) here in the US. In fact personally when I read “beep” I think of sharp, bright, high-pitched, electronic sounds, like that are so common inside of modern cars, but sure I guess I can see where you got confused.
By this same grace though, I wouldn’t call someone a misleading dick over onomatopoeia. If you tell me what word op should’ve used I’ll tell you why your choice is ambiguous too
“new bill requires vehicles to alert their drivers when…etc”
notice the lack of type of notification? and specifying who is notifying whom? It isn’t difficult to not be a misleading dick.
Sure, I’ll give you that
here in the US everyone beeps their horn.
next you’re going to tell me that people in the USA don’t have blinkers to indicate proposed turning direction.
Heh. blinkers.
It’s like going to the bathroom in a shopping centre. Like there’s actually a bathroom and not just a xitter or toilet.
And this would do what?
For the minority of drivers, get them to slow down. For the majority who speed, same as the seat belt alarm that annoys them but fails to get them to buckle up.
Anoy people until they go crazy and shoot up a mall.
Many cars used to do this. There is a reason they don’t build this feature any longer.
Mandatory distractions. What could go wrong?
