• FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Anything to fill all that absolute wasted space from every website formatting things to fit phones and not desktops. Ultra wide really sucks ass for a lot of things.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        IMO that’s mostly a window-management problem, not an app layout problem. The point of an ultra wide monitor setup (other than flight sims or something) is to be able to view a bunch of different things side-by-side.

        Edit: speaking of which, now that we’ve come almost full-circle from no tab support, to multiple tabs in the same process, to one process per tab, it seems to me that tabs themselves ought to be part of the window decoration, not the app. I mean, they’re useful for almost everything you might want to have multiples of (editors, file managers, terminals, etc.) so why force every app maker to implement them over and over again?

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          tabs themselves ought to be part of the window decoration, not the app

          Well, Windows did try that. It sounds cool as an idea, but it also severely limits what the tabs can do, as most programs don’t need tabs that are as advanced as browsers’, and even browsers’ implementations of tabs vary widely.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exactly. I have an ultrawide at work, and I just have three things open side-by-side. I have a dual-monitor setup at home, and I have two things on the larger one (27") one and one on the other (24"). My workflow is nearly equivalent between them, the main difference is bezels.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        To be honest, it’s not just for phones. The wider the monitor, the more I’d need to move my head if a website uses the whole space, instead of keeping it centered. Obviously it shouldn’t be too slim but you can’t really just fill an entire monitor or align your content to the left of the screen anymore nowadays.

    • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its honestly the only reason i use brave and edge over Firefox. Can fully commit to FF now.

        • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          The way tree style tabs worked after they broke it was never very good. Floorp is what to use if you wanted side tabs on Firefox.

          That said I still went back to Vivaldi after trying to use Floorp because of stupid little ux issues like pinned tabs not being protected from closing, and broken session saving.

            • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              The issue is that because they broke the UI customization that allowed for it all the extensions are just a kludge to add a panel to the side without actually getting rid of the top tabs.

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, but you have to have a custom user.js file or whatever to remove the tabs on top.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I remember back in the day (FF 4?) I had the window buttons, tabs, back/forward, URL bar, etc all on one row, which was pretty cool. So it was something like this, from left to right:

                1. Firefox menu - was Firefox, but now would be the hamberger menu
                2. back/forward buttons
                3. extension butons
                4. URL bar
                5. tabs

                It worked pretty well. It would be nice to do that again.

                • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’m sure you’re right lol I just don’t know it and its more work than it needs to be.

                  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    That it is. Firefox updates have broken my CSS several times now, so I am quite happy for them to add side tab officially.

            • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I have been running vertical tabs for a while now and it’s broken about 3 times, once every few months. Currently, I’ve had no min/maximise/close buttons for about a week because I can’t be bothered to fix it. Far from “one and done”.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I admit, this news has made me add a note to re-download firefox on my work machine…

    • spiderman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      would be cool if it’s smooth like how arc does it, would instantly switch back to Firefox if they manage that. arc is still buggy on many things or when i use some websites.

      • mke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s unnecessarily dismissive. Unfortunately, even the best extensions have their downsides. Some used a browser that suited their preferences better instead, which is a shame for both Firefox and the user, in my opinion.

        Mozilla recognizes this and is finally taking action to integrate highly requested features into Firefox. Many “who really care” are glad for this, because it is a good thing.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        What’s extra funny is that those extensions are made by Mozilla already

        At least tab grouping and vert tabs were last I looked