• qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Okay, so I’m going to leave my two cents here.

    I’m European, from a left leaning, liberal (in the sense we actively recognize individual rights and liberties but one individual freedom can not tramble the next), and this exact same legal disposition exists.

    Allow me to share the explanation I was given.

    Fresh water is not easy to manage, sanitize transport and distribute. The operation is insanely complex and expensive, with huge expenses for quality control, infrastructure and machinery.

    Water is a public service here; it is a guaranteed right. You need to reach extreme lengths to have your water service shut off, like having several months of delinquent bills.

    however, all of this infrastructure needs to be paid for and it is paid through a serious of added charges, some percentually calculated based off the amount of water you use, others are fixed values charged as service fees (like sanitation and garbage collection).

    This implies that if all the water consumed in an entire building was being paid by a single person, the water itself would be paid, but related costs would only be charged once, meaning the portion of money collected to cover the entire maintenance of the services would be severely reduced.

    By enforcing that for each home there must be a separate service, the overall cost is diluted and the value service is maintained as cheap as humanly possible and the basic services are maintained as public services, out of the reach of private sector interest.

    And, please take my word for, you do not want water, sewage or garbage collection controlled by private companies.

    These are sectors where there is a limit for how much expense you can cut. It requires constant investment in machinery and infrastructure to just maintain operations. Improving efficiency requires even higher investment that is only recoupable after several years, if ever.

    Privates work for profit. These entities work to just break even, although some can be highly profitable, but profit is always destined to reinvest.

    • IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re definitely right about the reasons why, but it’s extremely frustrating to have this kind of situation when we could probably just find another way to find it and treat water like a basic human right!

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And, please take my word for, you do not want water, sewage or garbage collection controlled by private companies.

      I’m glad I have the freedom to choose between one private water company and one private garbage collection company, and I hope my sewer system is soon given away to a faceless multinational and not paid directly to my local government.

      Because I’m an American goddammit!

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your sewage system is already partially private. I can say this with confidence if you live anywhere on earth outside of maybe North Korea.

        It’s a question of how much. Like my city for example: if you had a sewage emergency at night the people who show work for a private company. All the people working, part-time, there are pretty much retired government workers. Now is this a big deal? I personally don’t think so. The same company that services the night for my city has it for the neighboring ones. It just makes sense to have this be a part time job that spans a big area vs hire someone full-time to only work in one city.

        Now who built your system? It was almost certainly a private company. That subcontracted it out to other private companies. Is this a big deal? Meh, it depends. I have seen incompetence in both government engineers/project managers and I have seen it in private sector as well.

        Now who maintains your system? Well again it depends. Some special snowflake equipment you are going to have to call the OEM or their rep, day to day stuff the local government employees can usually handle.

        I guess my point is your system is already partially private and I am not really convinced altering it more government or less government would add any additional benefit. We have a system that basically works.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          When it comes to infrastructure, I don’t particularly mind the government contracting out maintenance. What I mind is the infrastructure not being owned publicly.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Hmm I have not personally seen that. Can you give me an example? The only thing I can think of is privately owned septic systems but I don’t think you meant that.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              My sewer system is, thankfully, still owned by the municipality, and I pay my bills to them directly.

              They sold off the water system to a French multi-national named Veolia for some reason, and I pay my bills to them now.

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t get it. Part of the price for water goes to sewage removal. So if You use more water, You pay more, You can remove more sewage. If one person is paying for 2 people, the same amount will be spent, what’s the problem?

      • thirteene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m sure a vc would approve an ewaste app that sorts your trash and recycling for you! They just go through your trash to see what products you buy, how often you go through them and be sure to share that data with their advertising partners!

        Edit:the point is they want to sell your data, not that we need someone to filter our recycling; but I feel the love.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          We have a municipal garbage service and they already use a combination of collection workers and cameras to reject recycling bins which have non recyclables. They’ll leave you a note about it and everything.

        • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          The fuck? I literally live in a place with private collection. Its cheap and none of this is an issue.