• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    291
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    Fuck wealthy assholes that think their opinion is more valuable than the rest of us.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        It’s called a plutocracy … a system built on power and those who hold power.

        Whatever it is … it isn’t a democracy.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        24 days ago

        When people talk about the illegitimacy of democracy under capitalism, this scarecrow and her late husband are why.

        How can democracy co-exist in an economic system where orgs are run like dictatorships from the top down, and individuals hold more wealth, power, and influence than entire nation states — despite those orgs employing, and being dependent on, thousands or millions of workers?

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I’m no fan of capitalism, but this type of electoral dysfunction seems to run particularly deep in America. There’s many other democracies in capitalist nations that have the basic sense to treat such brazen bribery as a crime.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        24 days ago

        It’s not. At the end of the day, their vote is still just one of many.

        Fucking vote. Get your friends to vote. Volunteer for a campaign. There are a ton of liberal groups that call people or knock on doors to get out the vote.

        The only thing she has is money which hires… people to get out the vote. Commercials, endorsements, etc. none of that was enough to get Hillary elected. GOTV is what works. Fucking do it.

      • pigup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        24 days ago

        Exactly, for all literal and realistic practical purposes, their opinion is absolutely more valuable than the rest of us. It’s not that they “think” it is, it’s a simple matter of fact.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          and yet their necks are all roughly the same size as everyone else’s.

          How very curious.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        It will go down as one of Republicans most favorite rulings and also the worst ruling the scotus has made… (Insert homer and Bart meme: worst so far.)

      • pigup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        They don’t buy the elections. There are way too many people watching the integrity of elections at least at the lower levels. This is why they have to gerrymander things and try tricks like voter ID laws.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      Well step 1 is wage slaves need to stop worshipping these clowns. Won’t solve the issue but ateast reduce their ability to sway public opinion.

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Seriously - how can any person be so brazenly and thoroughly warped?

    I can only assume that, like so many of the fabulously wealthy, she’s profoundly mentally ill, such that she really can’t grasp the enormous human cost that fulfilling her petty, selfish and ultimately pointless desires would entail. It can only be the case that she genuinely can’t grasp the fact that the millions of people who would be made to suffer or die for this are actual people - actual beings with lives and loved ones who are every bit as important to them as hers are to her.

    It’s either that or she’s genuinely evil, in the purest sense of the word, and on a scale the world has rarely seen.

    So which is it Ms. Adelson? Are you insane or simply evil? There’s absolutely no doubt - none at all - that it’s one or the other.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      24 days ago

      Psychopathy.

      To get that rich, one needs to be able to think of other people as things. “Human Resources” as such.

      If other people are things then there’s no moral problem “decommissioning” them be it redundancy or killing.

      What would make her evil is, if knowing this, she makes no effort to mitigate it. Given she’s a billionaire: evil.

  • Natanael@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Original title: Miriam Adelson’s Unfinished Business What does the eighth richest woman in the world want?

    The article shows how aggressively anti-peace she is and her beliefs about the land to support the above claim

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      24 days ago

      I mean… is it really anti-peace if she wants to end the war? Generally there’s peace for a while after someone completely wins.

      Would people who supported the US joining WW2 so they could wreck the Axis be anti-peace?

      Things to ponder.

      • suchwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        The eradication of millions of civilians is definitely anti-peace.

        A similar situation would be the US joining WW2 on the Axis side. I mean once Britain, France, Russia, China, and the Jews were finished off, there’d be peace for a while right?

        Ponder what unconditional support for Israel would mean for Palestinians in our current landscape.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          24 days ago

          You joke about the WW2 thing, but yes, that would have resulted in peace as well. Peace is peace, regardless of who wins.

          There was peace after Genghis khan conquered most of Asia too.

          I don’t ponder what unconditional support for Israel would mean for Palestinians in our current landscape, it would mean them being displaced to neighboring countries. Almost exactly the same as is happening in a half dozen other areas of the globe right now. You could displace every single Palestinian and it would still cause fewer refugees than the current number of refugees from Syria’s civil war, which has killed over a half million people.

          I haven’t heard of a single university protest over Syria though.

          • suchwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Lots to unpack, let’s hit the big ones. Do any means justify peace? Is mass murder of entire countries okay because it would result in less overall friction afterward? How long does peace need to last after for it to make it worth it?

            Displacement. Is it fair to the people who have lived in a country for generations to leave because of other’s actions? Moreso, many of them currently /want/ to leave (really really bad) but can’t, what should they do? And also, how is that fair to neighboring countries, they’re just required to take in refugees because Israel wants more land? (What if there weren’t neighboring countries?)

            Finally, (please educate me), are universities very invested in Syrian companies/industries? That’s what the current protests are about, divestment from Israel. Are you required to care about all atrocities in order to care for one? What line marks which bad things in the world protesters should inclusively be knowledgeable about?

            • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              24 days ago

              I’d argue that if Israel is attempting mass murder, they’re absolute shit at it. Sure they’ve killed a couple of tens of thousand Palestinians, but there’s something like 5 million of them, they’re having babies faster than Israel is killing people.

              As for Displacement, most Palestinians haven’t lived there for generations, a lot of the current population comes from immigrants/internal migration from the surrounding region during the British Occupation, and also from the wars (Egypt owned Gaza for 20 years after the british left) The population of Palestine has grown so fast in the last 30 years that the median age is 19.6 (https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/state-of-palestine-population/#:~:text=The population density in the,2%2C311 people per mi2).&text=The%20median%20age%20in%20the%20State%20of%20Palestine%20is%2019.6%20years.)

              How is it fair to neighboring countries? You mean the ones that invaded Israel because they weren’t happy with the UN drawn borders after the wars? The ones that occupied those territories and brought people in? Most of the people are THEIR people to begin with.

              If there weren’t neighboring countries, Palestinians wouldn’t exist. They would have been removed entirely 70 years ago without the invasion by those arab countries.

              Most universities aren’t heavily invested in Israeli anything… Israel only accounts for something like 40 Billion in total foreign direct investment, while Canada, the US, Mexico are each measured in Trillions of dollars. Unless a specific university went out of their way to pick up an Israeli-attached portfolio, it likely accounts for less than 1% of their total investments.

              Here’s a quote from the encampment people at my local university with their divestment demands: the university leases space to a marine company that has in the past helped produce equipment for Israel, the university has $4.3 million invested in Blackrock (a global asset management company) that in turn invests part of its funds in companies like Lockheed and Boeing which have relations with Israel, and the university has 250k invested in Scotiabank, which is in turn an investor in a single Israeli weapons company. The total endowment for this university is over 500 million dollars, so less than 1% is invested in companies that are themselves only partially invested in Israeli-attached companies.

              If a fraction of 1% is enough to cause an encampment, then yes, there’s likely some Syria-attached companies in the mix there too and nobody gives a shit about that (and it’s been actively killing more people per year than Israel for more than a decade)

              • Natanael@slrpnk.netOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                24 days ago

                How long will that rate of death last when they’re also causing mass famine while controlling the borders? You know starvation can cause number of deaths across a population to skyrocket, right?

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        It would be the same as ending the war Ukraine by letting Russia keep what they stole. Zero incentive not to keep doing it and it validates the side of the aggressor by saying “wow you both need to stop fighting”.

        Right-wingers love to cite self-defense as reasons why they should own guns and be able to shoot people who simply knock on their front door but the second a brown person does it after years of being systematically oppressed/genocided suddenly they’re just as guilty as the oppressor, if not more so.

        In short, wanting peace in that way is a pretty little lie meant to legitimize terror campaigns and invalidate the damage done to the victims. It’s full of horseshit.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 days ago

            In the same way that North Korea has “Democratic” in the name, sure. It’s all so surface level as to be essentially meaningless. While I agree that fairness does involve some arguing of that kind of a technicality it really only serves to validate the idea that Israel is justified in any way.

            Israel wants to eradicate an entire culture and their people. They want to steal their land and are doing so with the help of major world powers. They bomb hospitals, shoot civilians, and terrorize Palestinians on the basis that they’re somehow owed that land. Hamas retaliated and now Israel is complaining by obliterating the entire country. The “peace” this lady wants is the peace for Israel to continue to do these things without retaliation. She doesn’t want peace, she wants submission.

            The mega rich are just terrified of consequences and try, every day, to get their poor behaviour and lack of humanity written into laws and precedent so that they don’t have to ever to take blame for any of the rotten shit they pull.

          • skulblaka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Sure, if you consider the complete destruction of an entire ethnic group of people to be “peace”. Can’t fight if they’re all dead. But if you truly do think that way, you are the problem and I recommend a long walk off a short pier.

      • rsuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        The current war is in Gaza (controlled by Hamas), she’s talking about starting a new war with the West Bank (controlled by the Palestinian Authority).

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          24 days ago

          The current war is in multiple places, it’s hardly restricted to only Gaza. Even other countries (or at least nominally the “terrorist groups” in those countries) are firing missiles across the border into Israel. Lebanon, Syria, even Iran sent that massive drone attack.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    alternate headline: the adelson’s give billions to republican candidate again like they did every cycle.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    24 days ago

    trumps top supporter in 2020 election has threatened to… support trump.

  • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    She’s from Israel, she’s 78 and she’s got his (American, not relevant) husband’s money. She already supported Trump, who gave her some medal once elected.
    Bye bye Miriam, despite your (husband’s) money, you will be forgotten

  • uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    A real eye opener for everyone (except Trump supporters) where some of the rich want the world to go to … (or am i right?)

  • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    24 days ago

    i love it when these people get their names exposed in the media. i might not have even known who she was. now we can put her on a list. did you put her on a list? you should.