- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
This is how democracy dies.
I wonder how much Commissioner Lindenbaum charges for her vote.
I’m sure there’s no “conflict of interest”, “insider trading”, or “anti-bribery” training for her and I, an engineer with no direct reports below me and no power to make financial decisions, have to recertify those things annually.
Behold the fruits of “no matter who.”
If you check out the offending appointee, there’s not really anything in her history that suggests she’d be expected to vote like this. Like sure, who knows what beliefs she professed in private vetting, but public information doesn’t look like Biden appointed a risky choice likely to be friendly to big money.
FTA:
At first blush, Ms. Lindenbaum would seem a surprising apostate for the left. She once marched with Code Pink, the left-wing antiwar group, and later served as a top lawyer for Stacey Abrams, the progressive former candidate for Georgia governor, and her voting-rights group.
“She came from the progressive community, so I think everyone was caught by surprise,” said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for Public Citizen, a consumer-advocacy group.
Pretty surprising, wasn’t like some staffer for a more conservative dem or something, all public indicators were pointing to a progressive person. She also had the support of Bernie Sanders and other progressives, so the people in this comment thread implying omg Biden snuck a conservative onto the FEC are seriously misguided here or didn’t read the article.
What’s FTA?
Sorry, from the article
So if you vote blue, at any time without warning, your chosen candidate could flip and vote opposite of their what their constituents wanted like Sinema and Fetterman did. Manchin was always Manchin but the Democrats ability to run to the right after they get power is staggeringly consistent.
You spelled “behold the fruits of people who don’t vote because they think politicians will notice or be able to care, but it only drives candidates right to capture more voting power” wrong
Edit: Okay this comment is very controversial. The thing I said above is a basic fact. If a group markets itself as unreliable voters, politicians will stop trying to get their vote over more reliable voters. Your vote matters. Your vote matters. Go fucking vote.
Edit 2: biden is currently not touting his more left-wing accomplishments (and oh boy there are a lot of then) to try and get more cwntrost votes, because the far left is currently “But Isreal” which is valid but trump is NOT better.
Edit 2a: sorry about that. I many go say “them” instead of “then” and centrist instead of “cwntrost” which us the word a catboy says instead of “contrast”
You see what you want to see.
What does this mean?
Ensign crab is notorious for being clear as mud.
Oh
Someone who can’t come to grips that their lack of reliability is why they’re continuously sidelined politically.
I vote every election.
Progressives are sidelined because the party is run by conservative shit.
Yeah surely it’s not the “bOtH sIDes” crap and third party voting. And the lack of showing up for primaries.
If progressives were as numerous and dedicated as you think you’d have no issue winning elections.
Truth hurts.
Since we can be safely ignored, don’t blame us when your shit candidates lose. We told you they were shit.
Weird because a whole bunch of us showed up for a primary where there wasn’t any choice and still voted uncommitted. The dem response to that is to shriek we want trump to win, because it turns out they don’t care about our values just that we check the box that keeps them in power.
Since you know what I mean to write instead of me, you tell me.
It was sarcastic bro
Wierd how theres always enough Democrats willing to come out at just the right time to prevent progress or outright claw it back, but never enough republicans swapping over. Doesn’t seem accidental when it only goes one way.
Well not always - this story is about how for years and years there was a deadlock between the two parties at the FEC that has now been broken by a Democratic board member shocking everyone and siding with the Republicans.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Divided equally between three Republicans and three Democrats, the Federal Election Commission deadlocked so often it became a political punchline as investigations languished, enforcement slowed and updated guidelines for the internet era stalled.
Conservatives who for years have dreamed of loosening restrictions are delighted, even though many of the rulings were sought by one of the Democratic Party’s most prominent attorneys, Marc Elias, who was seeking political advantage and clarity for his clients.
Those on both sides of the ideological divide agree on one thing: The changes amount to some of the most significant regulatory revisions since the campaign finance law, the McCain-Feingold Act, was put in place two decades ago.
One decision this spring that is already reshaping the 2024 presidential race allowed super PACs and campaigns for the first time to work together to plan and execute costly door-to-door canvassing operations.
The dysfunction was so bad that by 2021, Ms. Weintraub pushed the Democrats to adopt the unusual tactic of refusing to close stalled investigations in hopes the commission would get sued for failing to act.
Interestingly, the campaign arm of the Senate Republicans lobbied against some of the looser rules that Mr. Elias successfully sought, warning against making sweeping changes in an election year.
The original article contains 1,691 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 88%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
