The EU will impose additional tariffs of 17.4% to 38.1% on electric cars produced in China, the European Commission announced on Wednesday (12 June), as preliminary results from its anti-subsidy investigation confirmed prices are being distorted by Chinese state support.

The value chain of Chinese electric cars “benefits from unfair subsidisation, which is causing a threat of economic injury to EU battery electric vehicles producers,” EU Commission Vice-President Margaritis Schinas said on Wednesday (12 June).

“When our partners breach the rules, we will assert our rights,” Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis said in a statement.

“Today we have reached a milestone in our anti-subsidy investigation,” he said, adding that “this is based on clear evidence of our extensive investigation and in full respect of WTO rules.”

Duties will differ per carmaker, with Chinese state-owned manufacturer SAIC facing the highest duty at 38.1%, Chinese Geely to face 20% and BYD 17.4%.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    21 days ago

    so:

    • car dealers don’t want to sell EVs, you need to push them otherwise they’ll try to sell an ICE model
    • car makers have collectively decided that EV = luxury vehicle that must be sold at least for 45k
    • car makers don’t really want to make EVs - when the government they introduce a tax subsidy, they increase the price by that exact amount (VW Up for example, they decided that it could be never to sold 5k over the ICE model - when the government increased the subsidy, VW increased the price, and when the subsidy rose to 13k they discontinued the model as it would cannibalize sales of other models)
    • charge point operators just want to get the european funds to install chargers, but then they’re going to neglect any kind of maintenance, to the point that for enelx fast chargers it’s the norm to find them broken or out of service and the exception when they work as intended.
    • charge point operators also don’t really want to sell electricity, so they set a 2000% markup. Paying electricity for 1 euro per kwh it’s like paying gas at 3 euro per liter
    • charge point operators have collectively decided that in order to pay for the charge, customers must use the most user-unfriendly process as possible. Can’t just accept credit card at the POS with lower fees, no, must register on the proprietary app, search for the charger on the map that almost always requires google play services, find it, guess which of the 8 pins on the map is the right one, hope that unlocks, and so on.

    it’s almost a miracle that you can see people driving an EV in italy

    • Quik@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      The point with EVs being over 45k is mostly the extremely pricey battery, China just subsidized until their cars are at a better price, the EU wants to protect European car manufacturers, that’s that.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          The engine has hundreds of parts but really only a couple of them are moving. That’s the beauty of electric motors.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            21 days ago

            They’re comparing against the price of an ICE engine and the fact that they don’t contain one to offset the cost.

            • bluGill@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              But they do have an expensive electric motor instead of the ICE, plus an expensive battery.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                Electric motors are substantially cheaper (and simpler, and lighter) than internal combustion. Hell, the typical ICE has two electric motors already in it! (starter, alternator)

                • bluGill@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  Electric motors are substantially cheaper (and simpler, and lighter) than internal combustion

                  Not really. There is a lot of metal - wires - in the electric motor. Retail prices on motors is a lot higher than the retail price on an ICE. https://www.grainger.com/product/WEG-IEEE-841-Motor-250-HP-15G092 is a 250 horse power motor for $30k. https://www.jegs.com/i/Chevrolet-Performance/809/19435110/10002/-1 is a 500 horsepower ICE (I think this is new, but the site also sells rebuilt engines) for $7k.

                  Of course with motors there are a number of different ways to built them at different costs. However they are not cheaper than an ICE and we shouldn’t expect that they would be as there is a lot of metal in a motor.

                  the typical ICE has two electric motors already in it! (starter, alternator)

                  Sure, but they are small, neither one is capable of moving your car down the road at full speed (the starter might do it for 10 seconds but then it will overheat)

        • bluGill@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          21 days ago

          An engine is not thousands of dollars. They mass produce them and so the incremental cost for each one is less than $100 each. There is a lot of engineering costs in an engine, and the cost to setup mass production is high, but that is amortized over all the cars they put that engine in. (there is a reason auto maters only have a few engines that they put in everything)

          A battery is $7000, but the raw materials and labor to make it are a large part of that price (I don’t have insight on what the price is) Of course auto makers know they need a lot of batteries and so are working on automation to bring the per battery cost down.

          • echutaa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            21 days ago

            An engine would scrap for more than $100 you’ll have to cite that figure to make it believable.

            • bluGill@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              21 days ago

              Last I checked the whole car scrapped for $250, and there is a lot more metal in the rest of the car (transmission, drive train…) than the engine.

              Engines are worth more than $100 if they are rebuild-able. However the incremental cost to the automaker is less than $100. Remember, incremental cost does not include the cost of engineering, setting up the assembly line, or profit margin (which are all very expensive and raise the actual cost) - just the raw materials and labor to run the line.

              • echutaa@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                21 days ago

                No citations and more outlandish claims. So I’ll put a little math here. From the first google results aluminum scraps around $0.44/lb and a smaller engine block is about 300lb which comes out to $132, not including heads manifolds, pistons etc.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      I think that there was just no good choice in this matter. I mean, look at how great it turned out for Europe to bond together with Russia over cheap gas. I know that cheap gas and electric cars are not the same thing, by far, but still, if we got dumped by electric cars in China, we’d be wide open for economic attacks like it happened just a few years ago.

      That said, I’d love if we compensated for this by finally shifting subsidies from flights to rail, or by shifting from 100LL to 100UL in general aviation, or cracking down on ships using bunker fuel.

      Or put the screws on BMW and VW to pull their heads out their asses and start being competitive.

    • Gsus4@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Electric cars will not solve climate change, public transport even if it wasn’t fully electric could…but nobody seems to give a shit about that :/

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    21 days ago

    Just for the record: Some cars from BMW, Dacia, Renault and Tesla are also imported from China and will get a 21% tariff as well. Probably lots of other brands as well.

    It will be interesting to see if they will attempt to pull production back home.

    VW seems to have an advantage by already going into fully domestic production, but they still need to prove that they can match the pricing.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      I think they would need far steeper tariffs to get manufacturing to move out of China

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        These are in addition to the existing 10% car tariff.

        Also keep in mind that there are large car registration taxes and VAT in Europe. While this applies to all cars imported or not, it does increase the difference in net price.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Hey it could be worse

    It could be a 100% tax like the USA

    Could also be roads full of boat sized junk from Ford, GM, and Chrysler.

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    China subsidies vehicles, say €5000

    EU tariffs vehicles, say €5000

    Every vehicle purchase basically comes with €5000 from the Chinese government for the EU government

    The CCP doesn’t want you to know this one simple trick

  • best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    BYD+18% or a too expensive European car, I know what I’ll get. Anyway, we don’t have cars fully “made in France” here, car makers should be ashamed of themselves as they mostly rely on those taxes to prevent competition.

  • Handrahen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    This is such bullshit. The EU is supposed to be encouraging EV adoption. There’s a market NOW for affordable EVs it will take years for European car companies to get into. The EU needs to help these companies produce affordable EVs faster, not block Chinese companies from providing a solution in the meantime. Climate change is already a crisis. We need to be doing everything possible to reduce its escalating effects.