• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    I mean Android, and Samsung in particular, borrow from Apple all the time as well. Hell Samsung frequently bad mouths Apples for the anti-consumer choices one year then follows suit and does the same thing in a year or 2 themselves.

    These kinds of takes are not the flex some seem to think they are in my opinion.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      So what you’re saying is, if you want advanced phone features sooner buy an Android, if you want to be subjected to dodgy business practices sooner buy an Apple

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah remember when Samsung charged you double?

      No ?

      Yeah me neither.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        Eh? Their bog standard device cost is usually pretty on par. And Apple definitely isn’t charging you double.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Which one is bog standard? Samsung has over 12 different models on production that range from 150$ to 1900$, including two models with folding screens. Apple has 3 4 almost identical phones, they’re all overpriced hardware.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            The hardware is overpriced, absolutely. But it’s also typically better than Samsung.

            By big standard I mean their “low end” device. The comparable Samsung of each generation is usually within ~$200 of the Apple model.

            • miridius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              Better? The Apple hardware is always significantly worse than competition in the same price class. Most of the price of an iPhone goes to their excessive marketing and record profits, so they have to cut costs on hardware

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              You mean to say that the accidentally bendy phone is better than the actually foldable phone? Or that the accidentally bendy tablet is better than the tablet that is almost 20% larger, equally thin but somehow doesn’t bend?