• shuzuko@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Nah our hands make much better foot substitutes than our feet do hands substitutes. Walking on your hands is way easier than trying to paint a masterpiece or code for hours with your feet!

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Nah, check out some apes, they’ve got opposable thumbs on their feet. Our feet are objectively worse, you can only stand on them.

        • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          14 days ago

          We’re a lot better at standing, walking, and running long distances. Not sure if I’d say objectively worse, just better at different things (but objectively way less cool than peeling a banana and eating it with your feet).

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            14 days ago

            We’re a lot better at standing, walking, and running long distances.

            I spend significantly less time doing those things than doing activities that would benefit from having more hands.