• FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Probably some combination of:

    • Require them to have a 4 year degree
    • No qualified immunity
    • Make them also liable to civil suits
    • Heavily slash their budget
    • Disarm all of them, save maybe for SWAT
    • much, much better descalation training (pretty sure they’re trained to escalate immediately)
    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I would add a measure of public election for every branch of LE, at minimum. If I MUST have a boot on my neck, I may as well get to choose it.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      In the UK, the training requirements for police is still surprising to me, as I had assumed it would take years to train as police.

      Either way, our police meet a lot of the criteria here. The budgets are nonexistent, they aren’t armed outside of specific circumstances, and they all go through regular de-escalation training.

      It hasn’t stopped many of the issues we see that are also shared in law enforcement in the states. Our force often uses force unnecessarily, there is institutional corruption and racism, and even in instances where the police have done something bad AND there is evidence it’s very hard to find justice.

      I think that a degree would help, or a training programme that takes many years and involves extensive training. It’s depressing to say, but the demand for good jobs with decent pay and employment protection would probably result in people becoming police just for the pension. I would also add that a good avenue to policing would be for it to link heavily with the law profession. Add a route for police to train part-time to be criminal lawyers, or for lawyers to join the police force.

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      How are you gonna slash their budget if you add so many requirements and remove benefits? By default that will mean there will be less interest in being a cop, which means you’ll have to offer a quite substantial increase in pay to compensate. And in most places there already is a shortage of cops.

      • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        My apologies, I submitted a comment regarding that elsewhere. By slashing their budget, I meant to say: divert it to other positions like to social workers so issues with mental health crises wouldn’t introduce excessive force. I think police really should be focused on the Public Servant part.