• BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    13 days ago

    What an absurd, ignorant notion. Of course social media has a negative impact on developing minds, but forcing sites to display warnings would have zero positive impact. Browser extensions would immediately pop up to hide those warnings, and if anything, the presence of such warnings would increase kids’ use of social media, since the danger is something even adults had a hard time understanding and kids love to rebel against oppressive systems. The warnings would turn into memes.

    The only answers to this problem are to break up and ban social media companies (not possible) or get parents to actually be parents and teach their kids about the pitfalls of social media.

    • Eol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      It’s pr. Same usual political dumb shit that doesn’t do anything but make a dipshit look good to dumbass.

      The benefit of the doubt is that they might mean well but they probably don’t.

    • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      get parents to actually be parents and teach their kids about the pitfalls of social media

      Also not possible

    • doctortofu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Exactly - such labels would be ignored even more than the ones on cigarettes are, especially by the addicts. And it’s so much easier to completely hide them too - adblockers already hide a lot of content people don’t want to see, this would just become another line in the filter list so fast…