Moritz Körner, Member of the European Parliament, disclosed the decision on Twitter. Swedish publisher SVG said, “The question was removed at the last moment from Thursday’s ambassadorial meeting in Brussels”.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    8 days ago

    You’ve gotta defend for an infinite amount of time, but they’ve only gotta succeed once.

    • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yep, and as I pointed out in another comment in this thread, Chat Control isn’t the only piece of legislation like this that’s in the works.

      Considering that the extreme right just won big, I have no doubt that one of these fascist surveillance packages will go through. Yeah, at first it may be used for catching criminals, until it isn’t

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        8 days ago

        Nono, it will always only be used to catch criminals, that won’t change…it’s what makes someone a criminal that changes.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Considering that the extreme right just won big

        Someone won big yachts from Putin.

        • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 days ago

          Source? In Germany at least that’s not the case, it’s mainly the conservatives who push for it. In the original vote, only the greens clearly opposed it. Later on, SPD (center-left) and FDP (liberal) changed course to also oppose it. Couldn’t find results for other countries though, so I’m genuinely curious.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            The labels get confusing especially between countries, but left and right are normally viewed as being economic policy classifications, but you can have authoritarians on right and left and all need to be fought.

            • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              I don’t think that’s accurate, there’s a social axis from left to right too.

                • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I’ve seen the compass, but in real life conversation when people say left or right they don’t exclusively mean economic views. For example, access to abortion or LGBT rights are generally seen as supported by the left and opposed by the right.

                  You’re right it’s reductive, and really there are many dimensions to political thought.

                  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 days ago

                    Exactly, and I try to point people to things like this to try to break that left vs right thought. I hope it helps someone.

                    I’m left on some issues, right on some, and disagree with both on others, and I think that’s pretty common for most people. However, we only get two realistic options, and they split up issues and “force” you to pick which basket you prefer. I’m worried people will slowly adopt views from the basket they pick since the alternative is needing to pick the other basket.

                    Anyway, rant over. :)

          • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 days ago

            I believe all parties in EU are not really understanding technology in general. So I think it’s a very bad decision to give these people power over these kinds of rules. They just have no idea what they are doing frankly.

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I believe all parties in EU are not really understanding technology in general.

              There are pirates. Well, after last elections it seems to be the pirate. Only one.

            • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yep, no disagreement there. This sort of mass surveillance is a fucking terrible idea no matter who’s behind the wheel

              • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                exactly, they these people are constantly trying to come up mass surveillance, over and over and over again. Never ending story.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes. Technically, a similar vote could repeal the law just as easily but there is a history of governments not giving their power away easily; implementing it also sets a precedent and creates technical enforcement options for other governments willing to go through with something similar in the future, or for hackers to exploit because gov-rooted devices will remain in operation for years after the potential repeal.