• Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s interesting, is their issue that you scraped their data? If so, then fair enough - that’s technically their intellectual property.

    If you have people going into stores and getting the prices, I don’t believe they’d have a legal leg to stand on.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      that’s technically their intellectual property

      No it’s not. You can’t copyright a fact, only its presentation. There might be some laws that they could legitimately use to stop you doing this, but it wouldn’t be copyright.

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        But, that’s exactly what they’ve got. Presentation of prices. If you take it from their presentation, I can see their issue. If you send people into stores to gather those facts for yourself, they don’t have a legal leg to stand on.

        What I don’t really understand is why they take issue in the first place. You’re effectively advertising for them on your site.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          No, the price is a fact. If the price were included in a paragraph of prose, that prose could be copyrighted. The whole design and layout of their site could maybe be considered creative enough to be copyrighted. But the raw numbers cannot.

          • Nath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m not at all versed in the legalese, perhaps I’m using the wrong term (IP). We are in agreement that they can’t do anything about your site having their prices listed.

            What they probably can do something about is you taking that data from their API or website without authorisation. If it isn’t called Intellectual Property, then let’s call it “Woolies doesn’t like that” law.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              There might be something they can do with respect to “unauthorised computer access” laws. I don’t really know much about our laws in that area. But failing that, I can’t imagine there’s anything they can do to get them in legal trouble.

              They could absolutely revoke API keys, though that would not prevent a blunter web scraping tactic.

    • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Allegedly they where complaining about improper use of their api. Btw did u know that their api is very easy to reverse engineer and they issue a new api key as a cookie every time u visit the consumer website.