I’m not very well-versed on all this but it seems

Edit: I don’t think this is the best, its just all I’m generally familiar with

First Past The Post

Benefits the two parties in a two-party duopoly system like that of the US. Boom or bust, black or white. When the party in power pisses you off you vote their competitor even if holding your nose.

Seems like there must be a better way, maybe just not as good for those who prefer shooting fish in a barrel

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think the ideal solution would be like selecting skills in an rpg. You get some number of points, say 10, and you can give as many or as few to each candidate as you want. If there’s only one candidate you want you give them all your points, otherwise, you can do essentially the same thing as rank choice and give some to every candidate but different amounts

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That way still ends up with candidates that you didn’t vote for though, the ranked choice method means you always have a vote in each round.