• Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Time to translate those surrender instruction leaflets to Korean. Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe that’s the tactic, force Ukraine to divert food and resources to feeding thousands of Korean deserters.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ukrain is a country of 40 million people, with millions already internally displaced from the war. A few thousand extra refugees wouldnt even be noticed.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

      Or just invite the South Korean government to send agents to Ukraine to invite them all to South Korea.

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Does north korea have actually good military power? I’ve seen their parades here and there, but does anyone know if they have updated equipment, trained military personnel, good intelligence, etc?

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Military is the only thing they have. It might not be the most modern, but they have more artilery shells than any other country. Other stockpiles are huge AF as well. Almost 4% of their population are in active military service and 2% more are reservists. In terms of head count, they have almost as many active personel as Russia while having a fraction of population. Plenty of disposable meat!

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s all smoke and mirrors, the majority of their stockpiles would be bordering on defunct. Modern equipment they have is far and few between, their training is subpar.

        Plenty of disposable meat is certainly correct though!

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          You may be right. We just saw how Russia performed in the war in Ukraine despite the prior years of flexing lol. It’s not impossible to believe that the North Korean military is the same.

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Agreed that they have a pretty big military in terms of raw numbers. I’m not going to discuss quality because the biggest question mark here is force projection.

        How are they planning on sending over any significant manpower and supplies across 2800km?

        They don’t even have a navy capable of circumnavigating the korean peninsula, much less make the trip to Ukraine or the wrong side of Russia.

        They have 2 transport aircraft, the bigger of the 2 has a max passenger capacity of 44 pax. Neither of those have the range to get near Ukraine when flying fully fueled, nevermind if it were fully loaded.

    • olafurp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      They have massive amount of soldiers and are good and making artillery and missiles. It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

      Their economy is practically built for conflict so it shouldn’t be taken lightly.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

        They’ve been deployed to Syria since at least 2019 and assisted Hezbollah in its tunnel networks going back decades.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I don’t think numbers is everything, lacking experience or leadership can tip the balance against you in a blink

        • olafurp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, I have a feeling that they will have very low morale because of lack of motivating factors. Desertion might also become a massive problem since this is one of the few ways to get out of the DPRK.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    4 days ago

    I hope everyone that keeps down voting me for talking about WW3 are right…

    But man, it really is starting to look like WW3

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      But man, it really is starting to look like WW3

      It looks more like Crimean War II to me.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      People forgot how long it took the other world wars to really get rolling. (Presumably because they weren’t alive when it happened.)

      I’m also of the opinion that unless something happens to de-escalate this conflict it will inevitably draw Europe, the US, and China in.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        They also forget about the 4+1 treaty.

        If Israel expands to other countries, it would draw Russia in on their side, and the US on Israel’s

        Which now also brings NK in. And we’ve got a multi front multi country war with two distinct fronts.

        People might not call it WW3, but there’s a world war coming straight ahead, and as good of a movie as it was, I dont want to recreate the Titanic

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Everybody is already in and picked the side…

        We just waiting for the other shoe to drop… Is US Marines landing in Crimea or other wild scenario where everyone goes: " well damn and that’s how it turned into ww3"

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It didn’t take long at all for WW1 to get rolling.

        June 28, 1914 Archduke Francis Ferdinand is assassinated.

        July 28, 1914 Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia, beginning World War I

        WW1 has an insane pace compared to WW2. Battles where a single day has casualty numbers that compare to an entire month past D-day.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I honestly think he might legitimately believe that a couple platoons of NK soldiers will clear this whole mess right up and then the world will have to take them seriously.

        The North Korean leadership is not exactly well known for their excellent grasp of reality.

        • Gigasser@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          My thought is maybe either food or arms or research for arms production/nukes from the Russians.

          Edit Addendum: the article says as much actually lol. This is what I get for just trying to get an idea of NK actions from the title.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It never leads anywhere though. North Korea has always been fobbed off with decades-old technology,it’s not like they will know.

            So everyone continues to ignore them because they continue not to be a threat. It’s not in Russia’s interest to give them anything really advanced, assuming they have anything left to give them. The best thing Russia could give them would be infrastructure engineers but they’re probably not interested in their own populace enough to consider that a worthy exchange.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      To me it looks like N Korea wanting to acquire some direct combat experience to continue to develop their skills and capabilities.

      But yes, personally I was not expecting this.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The truth is, we don’t fucking know. No expert would tell you that Russia is ready to invade Ukraine, and here we go.

      • bluGill@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Be careful here. Experts would tell you that Russia was going to invade Ukraine. However as you say Russia wasn’t ready for it.

      • someacnt_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wasn’t even an expert but I knew they would do that just by distribution of military. Did not expect Civ 5 to be accurate, tho

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not an expert either and I could have predicted the invasion based on:

        • huge buildup of troops in preparation for invasion
        • 8 years prior they had invaded after saying they wouldn’t
    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      a yes, one country against the entire world, truly the ww3 of all times, we downvote your take is stupid

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They didn’t start calling WWII what it is until 1944, but I think we can all agree it didn’t start in 1944.
      Just like later historians placed the start of WWII on multiple different events depending on which country you’re in, the start of World War III will be long before we start calling it that.
      I’m in the camp that the start of WW3 will be the Russian invasion of Ukraine if things continue to escalate the way they’re going, because that’s when you really started seeing lines being drawn between the axis and allies.
      Russia, China, Iran, and NK are the most recognizable names that have aligned themselves with the axis so far.
      The lines are already drawn and future events will dictate whether or not we’re currently living in WW3 today.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Pretty sure Iran adopted “Axis of Resistance” already. Least they already know what side they are on.

          Really getting sick of people deciding to just like…starting shit instead of focusing on constructive competitions like science or space races to other planets. Why do people feel the need to kill the shit out of each other and subjugate their population whilst climate change is bearing down on us? :p

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            I am also sick to the core about this aspect of humanity. I feel that we as a species are just about developed enough to understand how a better world would look like, and how people should act, what’s “the right thing to do” - and very much not developed enough to overcome our egoism and narcissism to make it happen, so we do the wrong thing despite knowing better far too often.

            • bluGill@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over. You want to be friends with the people in your village, but if you kill the next one you can expand your farm/hunting/gathering grounds and then leave it to your kids - while otherwise you won’t have enough food for all the kids and your DNA is in danger of not getting passed on.

              In our modern world we mostly have plenty of food (and when we don’t lack of land is not the issue), but that isn’t what our DNA is evolved to “think”

              • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over.

                That is an incredibly stupid take. For most of history, the planet was so vast that people had plenty of room to hunt / farm / whatever. And no, killing other humans is not in our DNA, the only people who feel like that are those with brain damage / development defects.

                • bluGill@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Most of the planet was not accessable. It was there but your local population grew until the land couldn’t support more. There wasn’t much opportunity to move as the surronding villages had the same problem.

                  of course when a famon came you got a few generations of peace here and there

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        And some would argue that WW1 was WW2 and WW2 WAS WW3. The 7 years war/French and Indian (not French vs Indian) war are commonly referred to as the real first world war. And then the Nepoleonic wars are similarly thought of by some to have been a world war of sorts

        • bluGill@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          WWI was called the great war, and the war to end all wars until WWII broke out. I sometimes call WWII just the great war part 2 - the treaties that “ended” WWI were clearly setup (on hindsight!) to make the war break out again in the future when Germany got sick of those treaties.

          The point is names are added after the fact and often don’t make a lot of sense if you know details.

            • deranger@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              He was right for the wrong reasons. He believed the treaty was too lenient, when in retrospect it seems pretty clear that the punitive nature of the treaty was a significant factor in Hitler rising to power and then WW2 starting.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      To me, it does not seem wise to just let these two continue along this path, but I am certain there are numerous internet experts out there who can explain to me why we should not intervene.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        You mean Russia and NK?

        Or you meant the two countries in the middle of illegal invasions: Russia and Israel?

        • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Fuck Israel, but that being said what the hell does Israel have to do with anything here?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Israel and Hezbollah have been exchanging rocket fire, and Israel is talking about a ground invasion.

            Hezbollah has a defense treaty with Iran, Iraq, Russia, and another ME country I’m blanking on.

            If Israel invaded Lebanon in an attack on Hezbollah, that draws in Russia, and likely NK.

            Israel and Russia are the two countries invading others that I believe are the primary drivers towards WW3. NK is just a long for the ride until/unless they launch an attack on SK.

            But I think before that happens, we’ll solidly be in WW3. I think NK is onboard now, with the promise to be backed against SK later. No one is attack NK unless NK starts some shit, they don’t need a defense treaty.

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        How would you propose the intervention happen? Sit Kim down and say “bad boy, stop it”?

        What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

        Russia isn’t going to stop them from crossing their border.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

          Drop leaflets on them inviting them to surrender and upgrade their lives to South Korean national.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pretty asymmetric that isn’t it. On one side you have a nation that is rapidly running out of, well basically everything, and on the other side you’ve got an alliance of nation states which contain among many other things the largest most powerful military on the planet.

      Finally the nation that is running out of resources is now getting military support from quite possibly the worst place they could get it from.

      It’s going to be one of those ridiculous situations that only happens in Civilization, where you’re bombing cavemen with nukes because your adversary has failed to advance through the tech tree fast enough.

      • bluGill@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Unfortunately China is not running out of everything and they are looking like they might back Russia here. Iran is also backing Russia and not to be underestimated.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not really, proxy wars have been fought with multiple nations before.

      … practically everyone was in Syria… Russia, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Qatar, The USA, ISIS, Al-queda, and Syrian forces.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not exactly a proxy war when Russian troops are personally in Ukraine. That’s just a war.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s a proxy war because the two major powers are fighting in an area neither of them own.

          Iraq was a proxy war, even though US troops were there.

        • Mechanize@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          Russia is actively in Syria from the end of 2015 as an official belligerent, it’s not something new for Russia to fight directly while others use only proxies.

          But I can see your point; still - officially - this is only a three days military operation. When that stance will finally change in the official channels, it will mean they can’t hold the mask anymore.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not a proxy war between Russia and the US. It’s a proxy war between China and the US.

          Russia and Ukraine are the pawns

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The Korean War had over a million NATO troops and also tens of thousands of Soviet troops and, somehow, remained a proxy war. A particularly bloody one, but there was still no actual open full-scale warfare between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even China and America remained officially at peace, despite making up the majority of the forces on each side

            • Skua@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Apologies, I was using “NATO troops” as a shorthand for the large number of countries involved rather than the specific command structure. You are right to bring that up

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Very few, as North Korea hand picks everyone who gets to leave by essentially keeping their entire family hostage, and any “traitor family” will find them sentenced to life in prison/labour camp - including any children born in those camps.

      And they are places you wouldn’t wish for anyone to end up in, especially your loved ones.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      According to hexbear you would have to have some deranged lib mind to believe any would want to.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those children are completely delusional. I saw a thread about why the entire country is unlit at night which was a parody of itself. I wonder what their demographics are, if not 100% bots.

        • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Surprisingly a lot of them on the Lemmy communities are also trans.

          I’m not sure they’re aware how LGBT people are treated in those countries. Either that or just willful ignorance I guess

        • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc@lemmy.federate.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          We defederated them a while ago over here. Along with some right wing instances too. The extremists from either side of the political spectrum really spoil the experience.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Maybe on account of the communities I subscribe to, but I’ve personally not come across right wing extremism on Lemmy. The tankies, though … so prevalent. Anyways, by server blocking hexbear it’s reduced by 90%.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        NKers are simultaneously brainwashed morons who follow their leader with fanatical delusion and utterly naive children who can be lured to defection by a few pieces of candy and a charming smile.

        The hexbears are too stupid to realize that all Koreans yearn for the unlimited freedom of their Southern neighbors and yet too wicked to believe the unvarnished truths of such media luminaries as Yeomni Park. They should all be sent to North Korea to eat grass and toil in the mines and get beaten to a pulp by Kim’s totalitarian police, then repatriated so that they can apologize for their ignorant beliefs.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    Funny thing is the eventual survivor won’t be brought back to NK after having seen the lavish lifes the russians live…

  • UncleBilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sometime back kim was crying so that women make more babies, now he is sending men to his friend. And we know the mortality rate of North Korea. I have never seen a country run out of people, I think I will see it soon

      • Ulfhethnar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is not yet, but NK is already supplying the artillery which is much more valuable than men to Russia and Korea will surely respond by suppling Ukraine.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not to worry! Li’l Kim’s Bestest Buddy and Honorary Number One Chief Saluter will be ready to help NK help Russia destroy Ukraine and NATO.

    All you MAGA service “losers” and “suckers” got quite the cognitive dissonance jam rockin’ huh.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          To be fair, the orange convicted felon and rapist found some good speed on that trip

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Biden broke all ties with North Korea after Trump. Reverting to the old demand to denuclearize before for any negotiations and imposing more sanctions.

      As we have learned from Ukraine. no sane country should ever give up their nukes because they become a prime target for invasion. If Ukraine still had nukes Russia would never have invaded.

      Biden has also imposed sanctions on NK which were undone by Trump

      Now I’m not a an NK fan but I’m not sure why people think pushing NK away would make them more friendly. Unlike the past where American sanctions spelled doom and America could bend any country to their will, China and Russia are now picking up the countries America pushes away.

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        NK & SK were making historical progress towards reunification until Kim and Trump met. Look at the pics from the summit and the timeline of inter Korean relations and it’s clear as day. He’s the reason relations went downhill.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        China and Russia are now picking up the countries America pushes away.

        Pretty sure North Korea has been allied with China and Russia for way longer than the US has been “pushing them away”.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Well yes because America had been pushing North Korea away.

          Trump tried to lay contact with NK. He might not have had pure motives for it. He usually doesn’t. But the action itself is not the problem.

          Biden hitting NK with the “new number who dis” right after becoming president certainly doesn’t make them trust us more. And thus they have been pushed further into the arms of Russia.

          The classic American imperialists refuse to accept that by sanctioning a country into oblivion they will now just join China and Russia’s side. They have alternative options.

          Most Americans don’t even know why North Korea is so hostile. We bombed them into oblivion during the Korean war.

          • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well yes because America had been pushing North Korea away.

            The classic American imperialists refuse to accept that by sanctioning a country into oblivion they will now just join China and Russia’s side.

            Most Americans don’t even know why North Korea is so hostile. We bombed them into oblivion during the Korean war.

            What the fuck is this revisionist history?

            North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950, after the South refused Northern rule. The UN stepped in (90% American forces) pushing the North Koreans nearly to China’s borders, at which point China entered the war, and resulting in the 38th parallel armistice border we have today.

            North Korea wasn’t pushed into China’s welcoming arms due to American anti-nuclear proliferation sanctions of the last twenty years, and “being bombed into oblivion” is often the result of picking on countries with bigger allies than you, just ask Germany and Japan.

            China has propped up the Kim dictatorship dynasty for the last 70 years, feeding their starving masses while the Kims focus the country’s resources on military spending, including nuclear development to substantiate their annual saber rattling. Allowing China to maintain a buffer state, that’s kept the West at bay since 1951.

  • Happywop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts? Blackrock would ruin these morons!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts?

      The US has been sending “advisers” into Ukraine since the war began. And we’ve had intelligence officers in this country for decades.

      Blackrock would ruin these morons!

      Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious, and without discipline, unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by them, and in war by the enemy. The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you.

  • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    113
    ·
    4 days ago

    If US and NATO are supporting Ukraine I didn’t see what’s the problem if China and North Korea support Russia…

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      You don’t see the difference in supporting a country defending itself from being invaded versus aiding a country that is invading?

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t think anyone is saying they shouldn’t be allowed to do it; just that they think it’s going to go poorly

      Also I would add that it’s a moderately dire sign as far as the state of Russia’s manpower levels. Every country at war desperately wants more soldiers at all times but some desperates are more desperate than other desperates.

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      If China directly supports Russia NATO will throw sanctions on them and that will hurt China. China is supporting Russia, but they are walking a find line as China cannot afford to make NATO mad. (NATO also will hurt, which is why NATO is looking the other way, but how long will NATO put up with China is an open question)

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        All the west should sanction China. But we need to have toilet paper production back onshore first.

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s almost like Ukraine is better than NK, from a moral and logical perspective. Ukraine isn’t starving their own people, nor are they “disappearing” the local Muslim population á-la China. They’re simply defending themselves.

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        72
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        According to you logic US it’s supporting Israel so I believe your “moral” and “logic” is pretty twisted…

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          There they are! The gENoSiDe JoE contingent. Still a bunch of y’all wandering around unblocked. Not to worry!

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          The US isn’t sending troops into Gaza. This story is about NK sending troops into Ukraine. It’s not hard to see the clear difference.

          • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            65
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Nice slippery slope…

            Edit: Israel didn’t even need soldiers, Palestinians didn’t even have weapons to defend themselves and are starving to death, so money and weapons will do the work to continue with the genocide.

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Huh? In what way was what I said a “slippery slope”? This article is literally talking about NK sending troops to Ukraine. I wasn’t even the one to bring up NATO or the US in the first place.

              I wholeheartedly believe Palestine should be freed and that we shouldn’t be supplying weapons at all. The genocide is disgusting. But at least the US isn’t using US troops, nor are they doing trade deals to send more poor people into Gaza (like NK and Russia are doing in this article, except in Ukraine instead of Gaza).

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Financial support and sending foreign soldiers directly to the frontline are two very different kinds of involvement. Imagine the Russian freakout if NATO actually sent soldiers to fight in Ukraine. Maybe the North Koreans will actually speed that process up.