• TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    113
    ·
    4 days ago

    If US and NATO are supporting Ukraine I didn’t see what’s the problem if China and North Korea support Russia…

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      You don’t see the difference in supporting a country defending itself from being invaded versus aiding a country that is invading?

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s almost like Ukraine is better than NK, from a moral and logical perspective. Ukraine isn’t starving their own people, nor are they “disappearing” the local Muslim population á-la China. They’re simply defending themselves.

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        72
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        According to you logic US it’s supporting Israel so I believe your “moral” and “logic” is pretty twisted…

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          The US isn’t sending troops into Gaza. This story is about NK sending troops into Ukraine. It’s not hard to see the clear difference.

          • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            65
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Nice slippery slope…

            Edit: Israel didn’t even need soldiers, Palestinians didn’t even have weapons to defend themselves and are starving to death, so money and weapons will do the work to continue with the genocide.

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Huh? In what way was what I said a “slippery slope”? This article is literally talking about NK sending troops to Ukraine. I wasn’t even the one to bring up NATO or the US in the first place.

              I wholeheartedly believe Palestine should be freed and that we shouldn’t be supplying weapons at all. The genocide is disgusting. But at least the US isn’t using US troops, nor are they doing trade deals to send more poor people into Gaza (like NK and Russia are doing in this article, except in Ukraine instead of Gaza).

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          There they are! The gENoSiDe JoE contingent. Still a bunch of y’all wandering around unblocked. Not to worry!

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t think anyone is saying they shouldn’t be allowed to do it; just that they think it’s going to go poorly

      Also I would add that it’s a moderately dire sign as far as the state of Russia’s manpower levels. Every country at war desperately wants more soldiers at all times but some desperates are more desperate than other desperates.

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Financial support and sending foreign soldiers directly to the frontline are two very different kinds of involvement. Imagine the Russian freakout if NATO actually sent soldiers to fight in Ukraine. Maybe the North Koreans will actually speed that process up.

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      If China directly supports Russia NATO will throw sanctions on them and that will hurt China. China is supporting Russia, but they are walking a find line as China cannot afford to make NATO mad. (NATO also will hurt, which is why NATO is looking the other way, but how long will NATO put up with China is an open question)

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        All the west should sanction China. But we need to have toilet paper production back onshore first.