• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    How do you prove Trump engaged in insurrection?

    You seem to purposely leave out the “aid and comfort” clause exists in here.

    Some of the underlyings were already convicted of insurrection related acts, and it can be easily proven that he provided aid and comfort to them.

    • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And, again, phrases like “aid and comfort” have precise legal definitions. It has to be proven that Trump did this. You can’t just go “Well, look at the Tweets!”

      • iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        don’t forget that NOT doing something can also be aid and comfort, when you for example actively DO NOT send federal troops to put down an obviously active attack on the government (which included violence against federal police) or by NOT immediately calling for those actions to cease.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        These words, as they are to be understood in the constitution, have not received a full judicial construction. They import, however, help, support, assistance, countenance, encouragement.

        https://www.law-dictionary.org/definitions-a/aid-and-comfort

        Easily arguable that he provided “aid and comfort”. Also, you’re full of it as the term has not received a full judicial construction and is not precisely defined, likely on purpose.