Why are packages labled com.person.mypackage rather than just person.mypackage

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Further it isn’t always com, you’ll often see net, org, and rarely even io show up as the base package. All that said with the introduction of modules and some of the other recent changes I’m not sure how much longer we’re going to see the reversed DNS naming system stick around.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’ve quite often seen people shoehorn their Github account into this format. com.github.username.projectname is quite a common sight for Flatpak packages. Reverse DNS naming assumes every package is created by a company while nowadays a large portion of popular packages were created by individuals.

          • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            It doesn’t check for an actual DNS entry though, right? Would it be possible to do person.developer.app?

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              10 months ago

              Correct, there’s no actual validation done. You can literally make the package anything you want, you don’t even need to follow the convention if you don’t want to, although it is of course considered best practice to do so. The entire reason it exists is just as a convenient way to namespace Java classes without worrying about collisions. I personally think using com.github.username.projectname is a perfectly fine way to use the system and is completely within the spirit of it. Likewise if you wanted to use person.developer.app you could, although that’s a little weirder. You might be better off using something like dev.person.app, although you’d need to be careful you don’t accidentally step on someones toes if someone actually has the registration for person.dev.

  • bamboo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I addition to the answers others have given, consider the large centralized package repositories for software development: npm, PyPI, crates.io, etc. If you frequently publish packages to these indexes, you often will find name collisions and are forced to come up with clever names. In the case of PyPI specifically, it is even worse because while your pip package might be uniquely named, the actual importable python package may not be, and you end up where two pip packages clobber each other. Java’s system is verbose but it is simple and solved this problem decades ago.