Good.

  • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, thanks for jogging my memory. I would have just ignored you and let my comment stand but I got to get the dig in about being a pedant so I figured I owed it to you since you were technically right which any pedant will tell you is the best kind of right.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      technically right which any pedant will tell you is the best kind of right.

      As a part-time pedant (is there a thing?) I think I love this statement; even if I hate myself for doing so.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        One of my favourite jokes for pedants.

        What’s blue, hangs on the wall, and whistles?

        Pedant: I don’t know, what’s blue, hangs on the wall, and whistles?

        A herring.

        Pedant: But a herring isn’t blue.

        So you paint blue.

        Pedant: But a herring doesn’t hang on the wall!

        So you nail it to the wall.

        Pedant: BUT A HERRING DOESN’T WHISTLE!!!

        So a herring doesn’t whistle. It’s a joke!

    • Rocket@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      you were technically right which any pedant will tell you is the best kind of right.

      Nah. The best kind of right is when you are wrong. That way you can learn something new.

      If I’m being honest, I was hoping you would poke holes in what I said. I guess I need to challenge myself more next time. But thanks for the chat either way!

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        In my experience you’re not interested in a conversation, just making circular, pedantic, bad faith arguments. I’m not interested in that kind of conversation.

        • Rocket@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          just making circular, pedantic, bad faith arguments.

          How else are you going to validate that something is true? You have to push a bunch of ridiculous falsehoods and if they all fall down then you can, with reasonable confidence, know that the truth has presented itself.

          Occasionally, what originally seems ridiculous actually holds water, and at that point you know something is suspect with what is presented as being true. This is why validation is necessary. Otherwise you’re going to start believing a bunch of things that aren’t true, and that would be silly.