We are contacting you regarding a past Prime Video purchase(s). The below content is no longer playable on Prime Video.

In an effort to compensate you for the inconvenience, we have applied a £5.99 Amazon Gift Card to your account. The Gift Card amount is equal to the amount you paid for the Prime Video purchase(s). To apologize for the inconvenience, we’ve also added an Amazon Gift Certificate of £5 to your account. Your Gift Card balance will be automatically applied to your next eligible order. You can view your balance and usage history in Your Account here:

  • Arethusa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Wow. This is why owning DVDs is better. And if you can’t buy, download via torrents. Imagine these bastards rolling up to your home and reclaiming a movie you physically purchased. We gave them too much power. Time to withdraw it. Convenience is not worth this shit. Get uncomfortable and get your entertainment away from these streamers who don’t give customers what they paid for.

    DVD rental stores could surely make a comeback given these new developments. Libraries still loan movies as well. Remember, Barnes & Noble didn’t run all independent bookstores out of business. And after Amazon savaged Barnes & Noble, Amazon Books suddenly came into existence (2015 - 2022). Greed driven corporations aren’t the answer.

    • victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Dvd is not better. I hate it when I pay for the content and I’m still forced to see ads for something I purchased. You might own the media, but there are other downsides as well. They actually both suck!

      • wagoner@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You mean like a DVD movie has a trailer on it for the movie itself? Not sure what you’re saying here.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m still forced to see ads

        Never heard of it.

        but there are other downsides as well. They actually both suck!

        You can dd entire disk to your HDD.

    • klemptor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Digital is the way to go - who knows how long DVD will be a viable format. Hard media formats come and go.

      • Arethusa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It still comes down to choosing convenience over not being taken advantage of. Building a computer, for example, has many benefits over buying one. It’s a matter of what a person places value on.

        Why follow corporations’ timelines for obsolescence? I’m sure if they could erase the technology of media players from people’s minds, corporations would. Best to keep people completely hooked up and dependent on their “services” so they can be milked of their money continuously.

        As long as the method and means to play the media is available, physical is my preference. Vinyl, CDs, DVDs. Cassettes and VHS quality over time leaves much to be desired and is the only reason why I wouldn’t add them to the list.

        These aren’t dependent on a network, internet, cloud. Own forever, build and repair.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I prefer digital out of convenience, sure (especially with music - you can’t really listen to CDs on your walks). But that doesn’t mean “being kept hooked on a service”. It is all DRM-less on my hard drives, no company is taking that away. I DO own it forever.

          • Arethusa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I don’t see the disagreement here.

            Digital includes digital optical or video discs (DVDs). DVDs and downloads are preferable to the situation posted by OP which is what I posted in this thread. The choice is convenience or not being taken advantage of and owning your media.

            And an aside, have you never had a portable CD player or minidisc player or mp3 player, nevermind a tape player? Are you familiar with Walkman? Sony still makes that.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Nope, I am too young for a player like this) And even if I wasn’t, it would be impractical compared to a normal player. Imagine carrying several disks with you. Not to mention the podcasts…

              • Arethusa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Right, so what is the relevance of this in the context of owning your own media versus being milked for money by corporations and having what you paid for removed at their whim? You’d have to be familiar with common usage of media players up to today to give a knowledgeable comparison on what was and is normal or impractical in that area, let alone the meaning of digital, which you don’t appear to be. My point that owning is better than allowing corporate exploitation for convenience sake still stands.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        DVD is digital, lol. And nothing stops you from dumping entire DVD.

      • HMN@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        So you’re saying it’s relatively cheap for the privilege of being in an abusive relationship?

        • Arethusa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Abusive is a perfect description. Exploitative too. I’ve always viewed store credit as a sucky refund policy. Offline. Whenever I discovered these, usually because I needed to return something, these shops lost my business.

          And the above is not even the same situation when you really look at it. This person didn’t want to return something. They made a purchase they wanted to keep. Then Amazon just said, “oh, we’re repossessing that media and keeping your money. Feel free to use this store credit on something else for which we can repeat this scenario all over again at will. Have a great day!”

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Putting aside why the system is setup that someone’s digital purchase can even be revoked at all which is another topic all together; Every refund I’ve ever gotten from Amazon came in the form of whatever I used to pay for it. So it’s possible that OP bought the movie originally with Amazon Credit and therefore was refunded Amazon Credit.