The delay was only 4 seconds. This time. But with 30,000 trackable objects in orbit and more every day, this is going to become commonplace and the delays are going to be worse.
The delay was only 4 seconds. This time. But with 30,000 trackable objects in orbit and more every day, this is going to become commonplace and the delays are going to be worse.
Why is it “going to get worse”? A 4-second delay might need to be done for launches more frequently, but I don’t see why the delays would get longer than that - debris moves out of the way at the same speed regardless of how much of it there is. This doesn’t seem like a big deal. If a 4-second delay risks killing your mission then you probably should have designed the mission with more leeway in its launch window to begin with. There are a huge number of technical issues that could easily cause a 4-second delay.
Of course, that doesn’t result in a headline that draws clicks.
Edit: I just read the article. “It’s going to get worse” doesn’t appear anywhere in it. You just made that up.
Do you think there will be less things in orbit in the future or more? Because it’s less ‘made that up’ and more ‘inferred based on what happens in reality.’