• Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    “We cannot have an alleged foreign agent in the United States Senate.”

    Wouldn’t they have to expel quite a few Republicans?

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If Republicans get behind this expulsions with those reasons on everyone’s minds it’s not a big jump to trying to remove the Republicans. Not that I expect Republican politicians nor their voters to actually be consistent. But removing Menendez is a net good even if we can’t use the precedent on the rest.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If I was Fetterman id run with this in rural PA come election time. “I kicked more democrats out of congress than Trump did.” God the confusion alone would be priceless.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sadly, the idea that any Republican is informed about the Democratic candidate’s record and policies is flatly preposterous.

      • SeedyOne@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        You do it for the out of touch, under-informed moderates… not those who vote R down the line.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sadly, the idea that any Republican is informed about the Democratic candidate’s record and policies is flatly preposterous.

        Bingo bango. No need to worry about them following up on why.

  • Belgdore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fetterman shows his own integrity. The news is trying to impute his integrity to all dems because of the upcoming election cycle.

    • holycrapwtfatheism@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, it’d be nice if either party had even a shred of what he’s showing but he’s nowhere close to the all of the democratic party.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    John Fetterman shows the integrity of John Fetterman. I am sure many of his caucus are nervous about maintaining a majority.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 months ago

      31 Democrats have called for a resignation already, so they’re not shying away from temporarily losing his vote. They went 51-49 this last election, so they can be 50-49 until the replacement is appointed by New Jersey’s Democratic governor.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        31 Democrats, including Fetterman, called for his resignation after the first indictment. Now, after a second indictment, Fetterman is calling for his immediate expulsion.

        We cannot have an alleged foreign agent in the United States Senate.

        I think it’s important to note that, at this stage, these are merely allegations. Menendez has not had his day in court, he has not had a formal opportunity to reply to the allegations. He should certainly face some sort of suspension, but taking away his senate seat flies in the face of “innocent until proven guilty” and sets a dangerous precedent.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Eh, it’s a 2/3rds majority to expel a senator, the evidence in the case is damning, and he skated by on corruption charges before through a hung jury. I don’t think we need to worry about slippery slopes because we don’t wait years for a trial to resolve.

          And being expelled from the Senate isn’t a criminal matter, it’s a political one. Senators can be expelled even if they’re not guilty of a crime.

        • Doesnotexist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          . I agree, and I disagree. What if the evidence against menendez is so compelling that there’s no doubt of his guilt I actually don’t know. If some Republican brings up charges against the democrat, on stupid evidence, and everybody could see it stupid evidence, then of course that Democrat should not be expelled.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            While they certainly could expell the Senator based on evidence against him, that evidence isn’t being presented yet. At the moment, we just have indictments, and given the nature of the evidence (intelligence sources) it probably won’t be revealed until it’s in court - if it’s revealed at all. As such, the Senate can only really go by the outcome of the court case, not the evidence directly. They couldn’t expell a Senator without telling the public why.

            The issue with the Republicans doing this kind of thing is that their base will easily lap up any fictional reason they give as “evidence”. So while many people will see it as stupid, a significant and very vocal group might not.

  • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Fetterman shows the integrity of John Fetterman; the democratic leadership in the Senate was more concerned with dress codes. Why does the rest of party get to claim benefit from his actions?

  • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, it really shows the integrity of the Democrats that only some of them want to kick someone out of the senate for getting caught accepting bribes a second time.

    • ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      And the first time around they didn’t want to kick him out because NJ had a Republican governor who would have replaced him with a Republican.

  • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    Integrity? Come back when that D is replaced with an R.

    If you are replacing a D with a D, that’s just virtue signaling.