You must be young. I’m not old enough to experience it but if you think that politics can’t change things (for the worse) you must have never heard of the third Reich.
“If voting made a difference they’d make it illegal” they are trying to.
You must be young. I’m not old enough to experience it but if you think that politics can’t change things (for the worse) you must have never heard of the third Reich.
“If voting made a difference they’d make it illegal” they are trying to.
You’re probably still good. They probably aren’t going to check where the bid came from, or even if it’s yours.
Not really. Our mother is very lenient and he was in training for the tail end of it. One of the reasons I knew it wasn’t exactly a fair question to him. He was in a situation where he would be doing better, but his financial situation, while having a better outlook for the future, did not materialize until biden. In general “how were you four years ago” is a complicated question.
He’d spent about two years thinking “woe is me” and waiting for a family situation to resolve itself. If it had resolved itself for the better I think he believed he’d never have to work again. I don’t think I’m allowed to say “exactly” how it resolved, but I can say things twisted in a stupid way and I’m pissed about it. After that he went into training for about two years. Regardless of his prospects he also had more how going into 2017 than going into 2021, for reasons that have nothing to do with the president.
I feel like it may have been one of those “I posted this on social media come to my site to see more” things but I’m not sure.
I asked my brother this four years ago. He said he was. It was a bad question to ask him because there are many factors that can determine this besides who the president is. Still… he was unemployed from 2017 to 2021 and he felt in 2020 he was doing better than he was when he had a job and could support himself. I bet he’d answer no today despite being employed for most of the last 4 years. He was fired briefly for saying “something they interpreted as racist” but he got a new job real quick. He bought a house under biden. I think it was a mistake and he could wind up upside down real soon, but he went from unemployed to rushing into home ownership. People who are committed will believe the reality they want to.
But then you need to specify if it’s the civil fraud case in new york or the criminal fraud case in new york.
I think you have Azerbaijan and Armenia flipped.
What kind of connection does Michigan even have with the AR15? The only think I can find is the wife of the designer died there decades after he died in Florida. They couldn’t name it after a gun that is produced there? Are they are so obsessed with identifiable firearms that they can’t give their own designers any spotlight?
“If voting made a difference, they would make it illegal”
"One party is trying "
There was an adjective for C++. It’s just the pointer was dropped.
Now I will think of this when listening to slayer.
I don’t like youtube shorts much but I’m reminded of this https://youtube.com/shorts/VcYT1ZcB_5w?si=E1stp-oOBCE6GtPU
I like trains too. It’s a gentle ride and it’s less stressful than driving.
The desenting opinion called the court the “library police” for refusing to let the state police the library.
That is a lot of parents and siblings who will not forget this. They feel pain too, and will not respond well.
I’ve played that hoi4 scenario as Czechcoslovakia and the only reason it’s winnable is because it’s a game and the ai makes huge mistakes.
I’ve been comparing this invasion of ukraine to Czechcoslovakia since almost the start, but there are differences. Not really between the justification or the foreign policy that the Russian government is using. Between the relative strength of Czechcoslovakia v nazi Germany and ukraine v russia. Also between ukraine’s negotiated treaties. Ukraine appears stronger than Czechcoslovakia but never obtained a defensive pact with a single other country. The Czechoslovaks had a defensive pact, but it was quickly abandoned. I still see letting them fall as akin to appeasement, some vying for leadership positions have suggested that abandoning defense pacts is justified sometimes. If it’s justified sometimes you may try to find a hole to make it justified all the time. All ukraine had been promised was weapons and we may be in a position where we tell ourselves we did our part even if we didn’t do enough.
That’s fair, and I’m sure many of those politicians in both parties have committed it as well. However the subject of the article has committed vast amounts of it. I think that’s worth mentioning. He’s the subject of the article after all.
Especially since their candidate committed it against all those polish immigrants to build one of his towers.
“Their corporations are ok making less money”
I have so many bridges to sell you
I understand going straight to nazis is a maximalist position. But this analogy hurts me. I tend to be picky with analogies because they tend to shred nuance, but this one is the worst one I’ve heard in memory. Implying that politics effecting things is like saying “you too can be a billionaire” in rarity is just wrong. It’s not the one example, mussolini was literally next door. For a more recent example, remember how the uk voted to wreck their economy? For one close to home, remember how a guy barely won the electoral vote (10,000 in one state would have flipped it) and now women can’t get an abortion in Texas without being on death’s door (doctors, be careful how you define that if you don’t want a prison sentence)? Politics affects things. Whether it’s nationally or who gets into your schoolboard and starts banning Darwin.