123·
30 days agoNooo not the alpacas🫣
“Coming soon to a species near you!”
Cosmic Cleric
All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
- 2 Posts
- 3.01K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 15th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
52·30 days agoNice seeing a game not needing a third-party launcher, but instead just works with the Steam launcher.
15·1 month agoor replying to week-old comments by someone doing the thing I find annoying.
Again, its five days since you posted your comment, not a week, and its just seen by me for the first time about two hours ago.
The point you felt was worth making a week later
Again, five days ago. Some people like myself stumble upon a post/comment days and days later from when its initially posted.
is that I am free to block someone who does something I find kind of annoying?
Yeah, for some reason people who complain about me using a license seem to keep forgetting that option, but instead just continue to complain, for some strange reason, no matter how many times I remind them of that option. Thought it was a good PSA to remind the complainers they they have alternatives to complaining.
That seems a little extreme to me.
If that seems extreme to you, then you need to touch grass more often.
Extreme would be continuing to complain about something that you have the power to change, but don’t change.
What is that point?
at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment
You’re free to block those that use the license, if you find it annoying to see.
You’re free to reply to a week-old comment, too, but neither is a great idea
Actually, five days, not a week.
And also, sometimes its just about making a point, even if you stumble upon something later on. 🤷
at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment
You’re free to block those that use the license, if you find it annoying to see.
what are you going to do? Sue?
Personally? I let Creative Commons know what’s going on, that their licenses are being ignored.
I’m pretty sure they’d have something to say about the matter.
Ah well then I might try and find a license that doesn’t require attribution because I don’t care about that part.
I would argue attribution is also really important, as it forces them to expose publicly how they’re training their models, bringing awareness.
34·1 month agoI’m a large language model and still learning.
How do you feel about this proposed rule passing, and how it affects you? …
Reporting Certain Large AI Model Training
In an effort to secure the development and use of artificial intelligence (“AI”), the proposed rule requires U.S. IaaS providers and their foreign resellers to report known instances of foreign persons training “large AI models with potential capabilities that could be used in malicious cyber-enabled activity” to Commerce.
yeah…its just surreal. I grew up when there was no Internet at all. Now we have bots mining data from a website to get more human-like responses (and more $$). Its a strange world.
Almost makes it useless to bother posting on online forums anymore, if you end up just wasting your time talking to an AI bot, instead of another human.
Which is a weird way lets the 1% win. If the rest of us can’t converse with each other because the ‘virtual town square’ becomes so polluted that meaningful conversation with other humans cannot happen.
There is a dude (or maybe more than one) that in all his comments he has an anti AI flair, or something like that,
I wonder who they are? 😜
For the record, I’m not the only one, nor the first one, to do it. I saw someone else do it, and decided to adopt it for myself as well. I’m aware of three people (and one large company) who are currently licensing their content here on Lemmy.
I wonder if that would have any effect.
One way to find out. It’s an easy enough piece of text to put into your comments…
[~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en)
The great first video card, remember it well.
It came with a kick-ass poster for its time as well.
Didn’t know what that stood for, I had to look it up.
Constantly as wrong as possible about their own stupid links
Starting to feel willful, honestly
I don’t recognize that second quote, as it wasn’t stated by me. Could you elaborate?
11·1 month agoFlu time, unfortunately.
Nothing like running a fever for five days, but at least it finally broke.
Didn’t know what that stood for, I had to look it up.
I’m going to hope that’s wrong, and that it’s just a certain percentage in any professional caste that has bad apples.
I am willing to believe that the percentage of bad apples is larger in law enforcement, only because of the type of people who would gravitate to that type of position that would give them control over others, and how much money is spent on monitoring law enforcement personnel by the government for legal and ethics compliance, as well as mental suitability to do the job.
And no need to reply to me with every bad thing that’s ever been done by police officers. I read them all, here, as well as elsewhere. I just can’t subscribe to the 100% pop that ACAB stands for.
for fun I ran this through GPT just to see what it’d say. Not that I would trust it to be correct ever, but it’s interesting getting an “outside opinion” about this.
I’m don’t believe an “outside opinion” from an AI company’s product, about if an AI company has the legal right to ignore a content’s license and scrape the content to program their models, would be unbiased, and should not be trusted, as you’ve stated.
Attempting to agree to disagree, and move on.
Who cares what lemmy.world said?
It’s where the content was initially posted, so any terms of service would be applicable to the content at the time of posting. That’s why.
The onus is on the Federated server receiving the content that’s already licensed to reject the content if they do not want to abide by the license. If they accept the content, they have to abide by the license.
And as far as the rest of you diatribe, I’ll just remind you that licenses can’t just be stripped from content because some third-party TOS says it can.
We would have seen much ‘money laundering’ style mayhem on the Internet with other people’s content before today, if that was possible.
I think we’ve discussed this enough, so I’m just going to leave it with an ‘agree to disagree’, and move on.
Have a nice day.
1·1 month agoHas the game always been very buggy, or did it just decline in quality in recent days?
From the article…
That’s what it comes down to, right there.
Google needs to spend money on people, and not just rely on the AI automation, because it’s obviously getting things wrong, its not judging context correctly.
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)